Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Interplay between tumor mutation burden and the tumor microenvironment predicts the prognosis of pan-cancer
Wuyuan Liao1,2,3, Xinwei Zhou1,2, Hansen Lin1,2
1Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Introduction:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced cancers, yet their efficacy remains heterogeneous among patients. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been extensively explored as a potential biomarker for predicting ICI response. However, its application is limited by several factors, including inconsistent predictive power across different tumor types and the lack of a clear relationship with overall survival (OS). This study aimed to explore the complex interplay between TMB and the tumor microenvironment (TME) and to identify novel predictive biomarkers that can enhance the precision of ICI therapy across multiple cancer types.
Methods:
We systematically collected and analyzed genomic and clinical data from patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy across multiple cohorts. Our dataset included information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) pan-cancer database and various ICI clinical trials. We first screened immunosuppression-related genes (ISRGs) that might interfere with TMB's predictive role by analyzing the survival data and gene expression profiles of patients. Using LASSO regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, we constructed a risk model based on these ISRGs. The model's predictive ability was rigorously validated in multiple independent cohorts. Additionally, we employed algorithms such as CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE to assess the correlation between the risk score and TME components. To further explore the therapeutic implications of our findings, we focused on RPLP0, a ribosomal protein that emerged as a robust biomarker in our model. We investigated its expression in tumor tissues and evaluated the impact of its knockdown on immunotherapeutic efficacy using in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Results:
Our comprehensive analysis revealed that the predictive power of TMB varies significantly across different cancer types and is highly dependent on its interaction with the TME. In tumors with a favorable immune microenvironment, characterized by high CD8+ T cell infiltration and M1 macrophage presence, TMB maintained its predictive ability. However, in immunosuppressive microenvironments, TMB alone failed to accurately predict patient outcomes. We identified 304 ISRGs and developed a 10-gene risk signature that demonstrated reliable prognostic predictive ability in both ICI cohorts and TCGA pan-cancer. The risk score derived from this model was significantly associated with stromal components and an immunosuppressive TME, characterized by elevated levels of M0 macrophages and activated mast cells. Notably, RPLP0 was identified as the most robust predictive marker during model building. We demonstrated its abnormal overexpression in tumor tissues and further showed that intratumoral RPLP0 knockdown in a subcutaneous bladder cancer model could enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. The combination of RPLP0 knockdown and anti-PD-1 treatment resulted in significantly suppressed tumor growth and prolonged survival in mice, accompanied by elevated levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α in serum samples, indicating enhanced anti-tumor immunity.
Conclusion:
This study establishes a reliable risk model that complements TMB in guiding treatment decisions for ICI therapy. By incorporating the interaction between TMB and the TME, our model provides a more accurate prediction of patient prognosis and treatment response across multiple cancer types. The risk score's association with immunosuppressive TME components underscores the importance of considering the tumor's microenvironment in treatment planning. Furthermore, our findings highlight RPLP0 as a promising therapeutic target for combination immunotherapy. The robust predictive ability of our model across various cohorts and its potential to improve therapeutic outcomes offer new insights and directions for enhancing the efficacy of ICI therapy. Future research should focus on further validating this model in larger and more diverse cohorts, refining the gene set selection process, and exploring the specific mechanisms through which the identified biomarkers influence the TME and treatment response.
Insights
Tumor mutation burden (TMB) predicts immunotherapy response inconsistently. This study developed a 10-gene risk model incorporating the tumor microenvironment (TME) to improve prediction and identified RPLP0 as a therapeutic target for enhanced cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cancer immunology and immunotherapy
- Genomic biomarkers for cancer treatment
- Tumor microenvironment (TME) research
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer revolutionary cancer treatment but show variable patient responses.
- Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is explored as a predictive biomarker for ICI efficacy but has limitations across cancer types and survival correlation.
- The interplay between TMB and the TME is crucial for understanding and improving ICI therapy outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the complex relationship between TMB and the TME in predicting ICI response.
- To identify novel biomarkers that enhance the precision of ICI therapy across diverse cancer types.
- To develop a robust predictive model that integrates TMB and TME characteristics for improved patient stratification.
Main Methods:
- Systematic analysis of genomic and clinical data from ICI-treated patients and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.
- Screening of immunosuppression-related genes (ISGPs) and construction of a 10-gene risk model using LASSO regression and Cox analysis.
- Validation of the risk model in independent cohorts and assessment of its correlation with TME components using CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE; investigation of RPLP0's role and therapeutic potential.
Main Results:
- TMB's predictive power is highly dependent on the TME; it is effective in favorable immune environments but not in immunosuppressive ones.
- A 10-gene risk signature was developed, demonstrating prognostic predictive ability and association with an immunosuppressive TME.
- RPLP0 was identified as a key predictive marker; its knockdown enhanced anti-PD-1 immunotherapy efficacy in preclinical models, increasing anti-tumor immunity.
Conclusions:
- A novel risk model integrating TMB and TME interactions reliably predicts ICI therapy response and patient prognosis across multiple cancer types.
- The model's association with immunosuppressive TME components highlights the importance of microenvironment consideration in treatment planning.
- RPLP0 emerges as a promising therapeutic target for combination immunotherapy, offering potential to improve ICI efficacy.
More Related Videos
09:32Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
The Tumor Microenvironment
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Abnormal Proliferation