Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
A two-stage robust decision-making framework (2S-RDM) for flood risk adaptation under deep uncertainty.
Jiacong Cai1, Yiding Wei1, Jianxun Yang1,2
1State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210044, China.
This study introduces a Two-stage Robust Decision Making (2S-RDM) framework to manage flood risks under deep uncertainty. It identifies 24 robust hybrid strategies for the Yangtze River Basin, combining engineering and soft adaptation measures.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Climate Change Adaptation
- Risk Management
Background:
- Flooding poses significant challenges to societies, exacerbated by deep uncertainty in climate change projections.
- Effective adaptation strategies are crucial for managing future flood risks, particularly in vulnerable regions like the Yangtze River Basin.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and evaluate a Two-stage Robust Decision Making (2S-RDM) framework for developing flexible and robust flood risk management strategies.
- To identify effective adaptation measures and their combinations under deep uncertainty for the Yangtze River Basin until 2050.
Main Methods:
- Simulated flood risks across approximately 0.6 million scenarios until 2050, considering uncertainties in climate, socio-economic factors, industrial structure, and population aging.
- Examined the effectiveness of four adaptation measures: building elevation, tunnel construction, population relocation, and river basin conservation, including their combinations.
- Utilized the 2S-RDM framework to identify robust strategies meeting specific population impact and economic loss thresholds.
Main Results:
- Without adaptation, 0.9 to 27.3 million people and $33.8 to $198.5 billion in economic losses are projected in the Yangtze River Basin by 2050.
- Identified 24 global robust strategies that limit affected population to <0.05% and economic losses to <0.02% in over 80% of simulated scenarios.
- Hybrid strategies integrating engineering (e.g., Elevation++, Tunnel++) with soft adaptation (e.g., Relocation) were found to be the most effective.
Conclusions:
- The 2S-RDM framework provides a valuable tool for designing flood adaptation strategies that are robust across diverse scenarios and flexible for decision-makers.
- Hybrid adaptation strategies offer a promising approach to effectively manage flood risks under deep uncertainty.
- The study offers actionable insights for enhancing flood resilience in the Yangtze River Basin and other vulnerable regions.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

