Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025
Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure
Published on: August 14, 2017
Liver Transplantation Versus ALPPS for Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Entropy Balanced Retrospective Analysis
Matteo Serenari1,2, Jacopo Lanari3,4, Svein Dueland5
1Hepato-biliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Objective:
The primary endpoint of this study was to compare liver transplantation (LT) with Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
Background:
ALPPS is usually performed for borderline CRLM cases and published oncological outcomes appear to be inferior to those obtained after LT.
Methods:
All consecutive patients undergoing ALPPS for CRLM across 14 centers between September 2012 and September 2022 were considered. The selected ALPPS patients were compared with patients receiving LT from November 2006 to June 2019 performed at a single institution. Entropy balancing was applied to eliminate all confounding bias simulating what would have happened if ALPPS patients had been transplanted.
Results:
During the study period, 121 consecutive patients were submitted to ALPPS and 46 were enrolled by fulfilling the inclusion criteria. These 46 cases were compared with 54 patients submitted to LT. Median OS after ALPPS was 76 months (95% CI: 28.9-123) compared with 72.7 months in patients who underwent LT (95% CI: 43.4-102 months). After reweighting, the risk of death related to ALPPS was higher when compared with LT (HR=1.40, 95% CI: 0.63-3.09) but no significant differences were found between the 2 groups ( P =0.398). When splitting the ALPPS cohort into completed and failed procedures, the median OS in failed ALPPS (31.1 months, 95% CI: 0-73.3 months) was significantly lower than that of patients submitted to LT ( P =0.043). When ALPPS patients were further selected based on SECA-II criteria, the median OS was significantly ( P =0.022) higher in the LT group (not reached) compared with ALPPS (76 months, 95% CI: 21-130 months).
Conclusions:
LT without current stringent selection criteria did not provide a significant survival benefit compared with ALPPS. The final choice between these 2 strategies seems to depend on the possibility of completing stage 2 and whether the patient meets the most updated transplant criteria.
