Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

601
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
601

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Chebyshev polynomial series frequency modulation model for waveform design and analysis.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

The Editors' and Readers' Choice Awards 2026: sustained recognition of outstanding articles in the Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same author

Biosonar dynamics and spatial attention in an unpredictable virtual localization task.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

From mechanoecology to sensory physiology to olfactory navigation: the Editors' and Readers' Choice Awards 2025.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2025
Same author

Microseconds-level coding of echo delay in the auditory brainstem of an FM-echolocating bat.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Echolocating Bats Have Evolved Decreased Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Temporary Hearing Losses.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

3.1K

Auditory brainstem response parameters in big brown bats are insensitive to echo glint structure.

Andrea Megela Simmons1,2,3, Amaro Tuninetti1, James A Simmons2,3

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.

JASA Express Letters
|August 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Big brown bats use echo glints for object perception. However, auditory brainstem response (ABR) recordings in bats do not sufficiently capture these subtle glint cues for object recognition.

More Related Videos

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

11.8K
Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
06:01

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

3.1K
Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

11.8K
Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
06:01

Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroethology
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Sensory Ecology

Background:

  • Echolocating bats, like the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), utilize spectral information from echoes to perceive object features.
  • Glints, arising from spectral peaks and nulls, provide crucial cues for discerning object size and shape.
  • The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a measure of neural activity in the auditory pathway, reflecting early processing of sound.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether scalp-recorded auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in big brown bats contain information about echo glints.
  • To determine if ABR characteristics correlate with the bat's perceptual discrimination of glints.

Main Methods:

  • Echolocating big brown bats were studied using scalp-recorded auditory brainstem responses (ABRs).
  • Analysis focused on ABR amplitude, latency, and root mean square energy in response to echoes containing glints.
  • Comparison was made between ABR features and the bats' perceptual capabilities regarding glints.

Main Results:

  • Auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitude, latency, and energy did not differentiate between glints in a way that mirrors bat perception.
  • While ABRs encode some perceptually relevant echo features, they appear insufficient to distinguish subtle glint cues.
  • The neural encoding of glints via ABR may lack the necessary sensitivity for detailed object analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Scalp-recorded auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) may not be sensitive enough to capture the fine spectral details of glints used by bats.
  • Further research is needed to explore alternative neural pathways or more sensitive recording techniques for studying glint perception in echolocation.
  • Understanding the neural basis of glint perception is vital for comprehending complex sensory processing in echolocating animals.