Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heterochromatin02:38

Heterochromatin

14.4K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions that take up more dye are called heterochromatin. Heterochromatin is further classified into two forms – constitutive heterochromatin and facultative heterochromatin.
Constitutive heterochromatin: It is a highly compact region of chromatin that is mostly concentrated in the centromere and telomere. Unlike euchromatin, the amino acid at...
14.4K
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures03:17

Inheritance of Chromatin Structures

6.6K
Epigenetics is the study of inherited changes in a cell's phenotype without changing the DNA sequences. It provides a form of memory for the differential gene expression pattern to maintain cell lineage, position-effect variegation, dosage compensation, and maintenance of chromatin structures such as telomeres and centromeres. For example, the structure and location of the centromere on chromosomes are epigenetically inherited. Its functionality is not dictated or ensured by the underlying...
6.6K
Histone Modification02:32

Histone Modification

13.9K
The histone proteins have a flexible N-terminal tail extending out from the nucleosome. These histone tails are often subjected to post-translational modifications such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. Particular combinations of these modifications form “histone codes” that influence the chromatin folding and tissue-specific gene expression.
Acetylation
The enzyme histone acetyltransferase adds acetyl group to the histones. Another enzyme, histone...
13.9K
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications02:25

Spreading of Chromatin Modifications

8.5K
The histone proteins in the nucleosomes are post-translationally modified (PTM) to increase or decrease access to DNA. The commonly observed PTMs are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination of lysine amino acids in the histone H3 tail region. These histone modifications have specific meaning for the cell. Hence, they are called "histone code". The protein complex involved in histone modification is termed as "reader-writer" complex.
Writers
The writer...
8.5K
Euchromatin01:01

Euchromatin

7.4K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions take up more dye, appearing darker, while the less-compact areas take up less dye and appear lighter. Based on the compaction level, chromatins are classified into two primary forms – euchromatin and heterochromatin.
Euchromatin is the less dense region of the chromatin and stains lighter. Euchromatin contains histone H3 extensively...
7.4K
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

6.5K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remodeling activity of ChAHP restricts transcription factor access to chromatin.

Molecular cell·2026
Same author

Cleavage of MEP-1 by DPF-3 reveals novel substrate specificity and its impact on reproductive fitness.

EMBO reports·2026
Same author

Correction to "Homodimeric Alkaline Phosphatase Located at <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> Midgut, a Putative Receptor of Cry1Ac Contains α-GalNAc in Terminal Glycan Structure as Interactive Epitope".

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Fungal β-Glucosidases with dual Activity: Linking biomass saccharification to cellulase induction in Trichoderma reesei.

Bioresource technology·2025
Same author

A novel therapeutic approach to adrenocortical carcinoma repurposing fingolimod to target sphingolipid metabolism in metastatic disease.

Surgery·2025
Same author

Pipeline Olympics: continuable benchmarking of computational workflows for DNA methylation sequencing data against an experimental gold standard.

Nucleic acids research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

The ChroP Approach Combines ChIP and Mass Spectrometry to Dissect Locus-specific Proteomic Landscapes of Chromatin
24:02

The ChroP Approach Combines ChIP and Mass Spectrometry to Dissect Locus-specific Proteomic Landscapes of Chromatin

Published on: April 11, 2014

18.3K

Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories.

Sevi Durdu1, Murat Iskar1, Luke Isbel2

  • 1Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.

Molecular Cell
|August 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Two transcription factors (TFs) with similar DNA binding sites drive different cell fates. Their specificity depends on chromatin accessibility, motif variants, and interaction partners, revealing key mechanisms in cell differentiation.

Keywords:
E-boxcell differentiationchromatin accessibilitygene regulationmachine learningmotif syntaxmotif variantspioneer factorspredictive modelstranscription factor specificity

More Related Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ChIP using Drosophila tissue
13:47

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ChIP using Drosophila tissue

Published on: March 23, 2012

25.3K
Identification of MyoD Interactome Using Tandem Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry
14:47

Identification of MyoD Interactome Using Tandem Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry

Published on: May 17, 2016

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

The ChroP Approach Combines ChIP and Mass Spectrometry to Dissect Locus-specific Proteomic Landscapes of Chromatin
24:02

The ChroP Approach Combines ChIP and Mass Spectrometry to Dissect Locus-specific Proteomic Landscapes of Chromatin

Published on: April 11, 2014

18.3K
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ChIP using Drosophila tissue
13:47

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ChIP using Drosophila tissue

Published on: March 23, 2012

25.3K
Identification of MyoD Interactome Using Tandem Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry
14:47

Identification of MyoD Interactome Using Tandem Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry

Published on: May 17, 2016

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Transcription factors (TFs) binding DNA motifs regulate cell identity.
  • The precise mechanisms governing TF specificity remain incompletely understood.
  • Neurogenin-2 (NGN2) and MyoD1 TFs bind similar E-box motifs but induce distinct neuronal and muscle cell fates, respectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the factors governing the distinct cell fate choices driven by NGN2 and MyoD1.
  • To elucidate the role of chromatin accessibility and DNA motif syntax in TF specificity.
  • To develop and apply a machine learning approach for analyzing TF binding dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Monitoring TF binding dynamics during differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells.
  • Utilizing an interpretable machine learning model integrating DNA accessibility data.
  • Validating binding predictions through cellular and in vitro assays.

Main Results:

  • A chromatin-dependent motif syntax dictates both shared and factor-specific TF binding.
  • Shared binding sites are located in open chromatin, influenced by local nucleosome positions.
  • Factor-specific binding in closed chromatin involves pioneer factor activity, motif variants, spacing, and interaction partners.

Conclusions:

  • TF specificity arises from a combination of opportunistic binding in accessible chromatin and context-specific chromatin opening.
  • The interplay of chromatin state, DNA motif characteristics, and protein interactions determines cell differentiation trajectories.
  • The developed methodology provides a framework for understanding TF specificity across various biological models.