Evaluating AUC estimators across complex sampling designs: insights from COVID-19 patient data
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Amaia Iparragirre1, José María Quintana-López2,3,4, Irantzu Barrio5,6
1Department of Mathematics, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, 48940, Basque Country, Spain. amaia.iparragirre@ehu.eus.
Purpose:
Many studies in medical research are currently based on large-scale health surveys. Data collected in these surveys are usually obtained by following complex sampling designs, which include techniques such as stratification and clustering. Thus, special care should be taken with this kind of data, given that traditional statistical techniques are usually not valid in this context. In this study, we focus on the estimation of the discrimination ability of logistic regression models by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). An AUC estimator which accounts for complex sampling designs has recently been proposed. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of traditional and new design-based AUC estimators to estimate the AUC of logistic regression models fitted to complex sampling-design health data.
Methods:
A simulation study has been carried out to compare the performance of traditional and design-based AUC estimators when working with complex survey data. For this purpose, the population of COVID-19 patients in the Basque Country has been considered. This population has been sampled several times following different sampling designs, a logistic regression model has been fitted to each of these samples, and the AUC has been estimated using traditional and design-based estimators. Those estimates have been compared to the true population AUC.
Results:
While the design-based AUC estimator offers unbiased results, the traditional AUC estimator may be biased depending on the scenario. Both the sampling design and the variables considered in this design have an effect on the performance of those estimators. In particular, the type of design affects the variability of both estimators, being larger when clustering is involved. In addition, the stronger the relationship between design variables and outcome, the more biased results offers the traditional AUC estimator.
Conclusion:
The use of the design-based AUC estimator is recommended over the traditional one when working with complex survey data in order to avoid biased AUC estimates.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Censoring Survival Data

