Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking.

D L Neff

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Confusion in auditory perception occurs when listeners struggle to distinguish a signal from a masker. This study found that altering signal level, frequency, or timing relative to masker pulses effectively eliminates confusion.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1996
    Same author

    Sex differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency maskers.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1996
    Same author

    Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1995
    Same author

    Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1995
    Same author

    The social construction of infertility: the case of the matrilineal Nayars in south India.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·1994
    Same author

    Informational masking for multicomponent maskers with spectral gaps.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1993

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory perception
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Signal detection theory

    Background:

    • Forward masking can be impaired by confusion, where a signal is difficult to discriminate from a preceding masker.
    • Pulsing maskers, composed of repeated sinusoidal bursts, can induce confusion when signal properties match masker pulse properties.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate confusion effects in forward masking using pulsing maskers.
    • To determine the minimum changes in signal parameters (level, frequency, duration, delay) required to eliminate confusion.

    Main Methods:

    • Varying signal level, frequency, duration, and offset-onset delay relative to masker pulses.
    • Utilizing adaptive procedures to measure confusion-free and confusion-determined thresholds.

    Main Results:

    • Confusion was eliminated by a 5 dB change in signal level or a 30-40 Hz change in signal frequency for 20-ms masker pulses.
    • Signal delays of 8-16 ms or signal durations differing significantly (less than half or greater than twice) from masker pulse duration eliminated confusion.
    • Listener training with distinct signal and masker intensities minimized confusion effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory confusion in forward masking is dependent on the similarity between signal and masker pulse properties.
    • Specific manipulations of signal level, frequency, duration, and temporal delay can effectively reduce or eliminate confusion.
    • Listener training protocols can play a role in mitigating confusion effects in auditory tasks.

    Related Experiment Videos