Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.5K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.1K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.5K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.5K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

13.3K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
13.3K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

197
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
197

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A randomized controlled Phase I de-escalation trial of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir combination for mild-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2026
Same author

An evaluation of designs for Phase I/IIa dose-finding studies in Tuberculosis.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Outpatient paracentesis for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: STOP-OHSS feasibility study and RCT Synopsis.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Decision on Optimal Combinatorial Therapies in Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases using Systems approaches (DocTIS): protocol for a single-arm, adaptive basket trial in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026
Same author

Modern Clinical Trials: Seamless Designs and Master Protocols.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Trial Designs II: Case Study and Practical Guidance.

David S Robertson1, Thomas Burnett2, Babak Choodari-Oskooei3

  • 1MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Statistics in Medicine
|August 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Confidence intervals (CIs) in adaptive clinical trials can be unreliable. This study evaluates CIs for two-stage group sequential designs, offering guidelines for choosing and reporting them post-trial.

Keywords:
adaptive designbootstrapconditional inferencecoverageestimationgroup sequentialinterim analyses

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

560
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

560
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pharmaceutical Statistics

Background:

  • Conventional confidence intervals (CIs) exhibit undercoverage and inconsistency in adaptive clinical trials.
  • Regulatory guidance emphasizes caution in interpreting CIs from adaptive trials.
  • A clear preference among existing CI methods for adaptive designs is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore and evaluate confidence intervals (CIs) for adaptive clinical trials.
  • To present an extended case study of CIs for a two-stage group sequential design.
  • To provide guidelines for selecting and reporting CIs in adaptive trial settings.

Main Methods:

  • Methodological review of CI construction approaches for adaptive designs (Part I).
  • Extended case study of a two-stage group sequential trial.
  • Comprehensive simulation study of proposed CIs for the case study setting.

Main Results:

  • Confidence intervals (CIs) demonstrate notably different properties in adaptive trials.
  • The study facilitates an expanded understanding of effective CI procedures post-adaptive trial.
  • Simulation results highlight performance variations among different CI methods.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers need clear guidance on choosing and reporting CIs for adaptive trials.
  • The choice of CI significantly impacts interpretation of treatment effects.
  • Proposed guidelines aim to improve the reliability and consistency of CI usage in adaptive designs.