Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Self-Measured 6-Minute Walking Test in Patients with Sciatica
Michal Ziga1, Martin N Stienen2, Anna Maria Zeitlberger2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen & Medical School of St.Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Kantonsspital St. Gallen & Medical School of St.Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital and University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Background:
Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) serve as indicators of treatment success in spine patients. While MCID values for patient-reported outcome measures are well-established within conservative treated patients with sciatica, there is scarce evidence regarding MCID values for objective outcome tests (e.g., 6-minute walking test [6WT]) that assess a patient's physical capacity.
Methods:
Forty-five patients (mean, 51 years; standard deviation, 13; 53% female) with sciatica due to degenerative lumbar disorders scheduled for epidural steroid injection (ESI) were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks after the intervention. Patients self-assessed their physical capacity using the 6WT as well as their subjective disability using several patient-reported outcomes. MCID values were calculated for raw 6-minute walking distance (6WD) (in m) and standardized 6WT z scores using three different computation methods and the following established patient-reported outcomes as anchors: visual analog scale (VAS) leg, VAS back, and Oswestry Disability Index.
Results:
The mean 6WD improved from 456.7 m (92.4) to 507 (89.7) and z score improved from -1.0 (1.1) to -0.7 (1.2). MCID values were ranging from 23 m (z score of 0.3) based on VAS leg to 76 m (z score of 0.7) based on the VAS back. The average MCID of the 6WT across all anchors and computation methods was 54 m (z score of 0.6). According to the average MCID of raw 6WD or 6WT z scores, 40% of patients are classified as responders to ESI for both parameters.
Conclusions:
A change of 54 m in 6WD (z score change of 0.6) results in a clinically meaningful change in functional status in patients with sciatica undergoing ESI.
More Related Videos
08:20Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Therapeutic Effects of FSN Treatment – Bridging Research and Clinical Applications in Neuropathic Pain
Published on: June 30, 2023
05:17Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024