Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label,
Fabrice Barlesi1, Wenxiu Yao2, Michaël Duruisseaux3
1Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Background:
Adagrasib is a KRASG12C inhibitor that demonstrated promising activity against KRASG12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 2 trial. Here we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adagrasib versus docetaxel in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
Methods:
KRYSTAL-12 is a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 230 centres in 22 countries. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS)G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death ligand 1 therapy, were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive 600 mg adagrasib (twice a day orally) or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (every 3 weeks intravenously) using a centralised interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified by region (non-Asia-Pacific vs Asia-Pacific) and previous treatment (sequential vs concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator or patient decision, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in all randomised patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04685135), and is active but no longer recruiting.
Findings:
Between Feb 23, 2021, and Nov 16, 2023, 453 patients were randomly allocated to receive adagrasib (301 [66%]) or docetaxel (152 [34%]). In each group, 298 (99%) patients received adagrasib and 140 (92%) received docetaxel. In the ITT population (median follow-up 7·2 months [95% CI 5·8-8·7]), median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 4·5-6·7) with adagrasib and 3·8 months (95% CI 2·7-4·7) with docetaxel (hazard ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·45-0·76]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events occurred in 140 (47%) of 298 patients treated with adagrasib and 64 (46%) of 140 with docetaxel. There were four (1%) treatment-related deaths in the adagrasib group and one (1%) treatment-related death in the docetaxel group.
Interpretation:
Adagrasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC, without new safety signals.
Funding:
Mirati Therapeutics, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.
Insights
Adagrasib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer compared to docetaxel. This targeted therapy showed a favorable safety profile in previously treated advanced NSCLC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Adagrasib is a targeted therapy for KRAS G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Previous trials showed adagrasib's promise in advanced NSCLC.
- KRAS G12C mutations are common drivers in NSCLC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of adagrasib versus docetaxel.
- To evaluate adagrasib in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.
- To assess outcomes in patients previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (KRYSTAL-12) was conducted.
- Patients received either adagrasib (600 mg twice daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks).
- The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review.
Main Results:
- Adagrasib showed a median PFS of 5.5 months versus 3.8 months for docetaxel (HR 0.58; p<0.0001).
- Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were similar: 47% for adagrasib and 46% for docetaxel.
- Treatment-related deaths were low in both groups (1% for adagrasib, 1% for docetaxel).
Conclusions:
- Adagrasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS over docetaxel.
- Adagrasib offers a new treatment option for previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC.
- No new safety concerns were identified with adagrasib treatment.
More Related Videos
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...