Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Diffusion in the Membrane01:24

Protein Diffusion in the Membrane

4.6K
Proteins show rotational as well as lateral diffusion across the membrane. The lateral diffusion of proteins was confirmed through the cell fusion experiment where mouse and human cells were fused, resulting in hybrid cells. When the human and mouse cells fused, the specific membrane proteins on human and mouse cells were marked with the red and green-fluorescent markers, respectively. Initially, the red and green fluorescence was located on the respective hemisphere of the cell. As time...
4.6K
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells01:19

Protein Dynamics in Living Cells

2.3K
Different fluorescence-based techniques are used to study the protein dynamics in living cells. These techniques include FRAP, FRET, and PET.
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...
2.3K
Protein Modifications in the RER01:26

Protein Modifications in the RER

5.6K
Modification of secretory and transmembrane proteins entering the rough ER begins in the ER lumen. These modifications aid in protein folding and stabilize the acquired tertiary structure. Protein modifications in the rough ER co-occur at different stages of protein folding.
Broadly, these modifications can be categorized into four main categories — glycosylation, formation of disulfide bonds, assembly of protein subunits, and specific proteolytic cleavages like removal of signal...
5.6K
Protein Translocation Machinery on the ER Membrane01:28

Protein Translocation Machinery on the ER Membrane

4.9K
The translocon complex situated on the ER membrane is the main gateway for the protein secretory pathway. It facilitates the transport of nascent peptides into the ER lumen and their insertion into the ER membrane.
Sec61 protein conducting channel
In eukaryotes, the translocon complex comprises a core heterotrimeric translocator channel called the Sec61 complex. This channel includes three transmembrane proteins, Sec61α, Sec61β, and Sec61γ, and is the largest subunit of the...
4.9K
Post-translational Translocation of Proteins to the RER01:27

Post-translational Translocation of Proteins to the RER

5.9K
A sizable fraction of proteins destined for ER are first synthesized in the cell cytosol and then transported across the ER membrane–a process called post-translational translocation. Similar to cotranslationally translocated proteins, these proteins also use the Sec translocon complex to enter the ER lumen.
Targeting proteins to the ER
Hsp40 and Hsp70 chaperone molecules bind the translated proteins in the cytosol to prevent their folding. The chaperone binding helps to keep the signal...
5.9K
Chemical Synapses01:26

Chemical Synapses

3.3K
Chemical synapses are specialized sites between two neurons or between a neuron and a non-neuronal cell like a muscle, glandular or sensory cell.
Because chemical synapses depend on the release of neurotransmitter molecules from synaptic vesicles to pass on their signal, there is an approximately one millisecond delay between when the axon potential reaches the presynaptic terminal and when the neurotransmitter leads to opening of postsynaptic ion channels. Additionally, this signaling is...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial Intelligence for Discovery in Life Sciences.

Bioconjugate chemistry·2026
Same author

Thousandfold Expansion Microscopy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A versatile nanobody platform for live and super-resolution imaging of synaptic vesicle dynamics and plasticity in rodent and human neurons.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

RNA promotes synapsin phase separation providing a platform for local translation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A correlative workflow for synaptic imaging by cryo-electron tomography.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same author

Viscoelasticity analysis of coarse-grained cytoskeletal simulations with Cytosim and Cytocalc.

Biophysical journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

In Vivo Single-Molecule Tracking at the Drosophila Presynaptic Motor Nerve Terminal
06:45

In Vivo Single-Molecule Tracking at the Drosophila Presynaptic Motor Nerve Terminal

Published on: January 14, 2018

8.6K

Geometry effects on protein mobility in a synapse.

Simon Dannenberg1, Sofiia Reshetniak2, Sarah Mohammadinejad1

  • 1University of Göttingen, Institute for the Dynamics of Complex Systems, Göttingen, Germany.

Biophysical Journal
|August 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study uses in silico fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments to analyze synaptic protein mobility. We identified two key mechanisms, redistribution and inflow, crucial for interpreting FRAP data, especially for vesicle-binding proteins.

More Related Videos

Utilizing Time-Resolved Protein-Induced Fluorescence Enhancement to Identify Stable Local Conformations One α-Synuclein Monomer at a Time
07:56

Utilizing Time-Resolved Protein-Induced Fluorescence Enhancement to Identify Stable Local Conformations One α-Synuclein Monomer at a Time

Published on: May 30, 2021

3.3K
Preparation of Synaptoneurosomes from Mouse Cortex using a Discontinuous Percoll-Sucrose Density Gradient
08:30

Preparation of Synaptoneurosomes from Mouse Cortex using a Discontinuous Percoll-Sucrose Density Gradient

Published on: September 17, 2011

31.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

In Vivo Single-Molecule Tracking at the Drosophila Presynaptic Motor Nerve Terminal
06:45

In Vivo Single-Molecule Tracking at the Drosophila Presynaptic Motor Nerve Terminal

Published on: January 14, 2018

8.6K
Utilizing Time-Resolved Protein-Induced Fluorescence Enhancement to Identify Stable Local Conformations One α-Synuclein Monomer at a Time
07:56

Utilizing Time-Resolved Protein-Induced Fluorescence Enhancement to Identify Stable Local Conformations One α-Synuclein Monomer at a Time

Published on: May 30, 2021

3.3K
Preparation of Synaptoneurosomes from Mouse Cortex using a Discontinuous Percoll-Sucrose Density Gradient
08:30

Preparation of Synaptoneurosomes from Mouse Cortex using a Discontinuous Percoll-Sucrose Density Gradient

Published on: September 17, 2011

31.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cell Biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Synaptic function relies on precise control of synaptic protein mobility and localization.
  • Experimental evidence supporting this hypothesis has been challenging to obtain.
  • Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a key technique, but its interpretation is complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of synaptic geometry and protein-vesicle interactions on protein mobility using computational methods.
  • To refine the interpretation of FRAP data in the context of synaptic protein dynamics.
  • To determine diffusion coefficients, vesicle-binding rates, and binding times for synaptic proteins.

Main Methods:

  • In silico (computational) fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments were conducted.
  • Simulations were calibrated against published FRAP data for 40 distinct synaptic proteins.
  • Analysis focused on distinguishing between internal redistribution and axonal inflow as drivers of recovery.

Main Results:

  • Two primary mechanisms governing FRAP recovery times were identified: redistribution within the synaptic bouton and inflow from the axon.
  • The study successfully derived diffusion coefficients, vesicle-binding rates, and binding times.
  • The relative contributions of these two mechanisms were shown to be critical for accurate FRAP interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Dissecting the contributions of internal redistribution and axonal inflow is essential for correctly interpreting FRAP experiments.
  • This approach is particularly important for understanding the mobility of synaptic proteins that bind to synaptic vesicles.
  • The findings provide a more robust framework for analyzing synaptic protein dynamics using FRAP.