Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
Published on: August 15, 2019
Lives worth living and the danger of ignoring non-identity limits on genetic preference
1Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore marcusteotianleng@gmail.com.
Abstract:
In this short paper, I detail a case against Dr Guido Pennings's latest publication in the Journal of Medical Ethics, titled 'The moral obligation to have genetically related children". I argue that Pennings, despite raising awareness of issues of bioethical and scientific import, fatally neglects to interact with a central debate in reproductive ethics: the non-identity problem (NIP). Taking the NIP seriously, we can see that the moral obligation that Pennings argues for falls victim to the same kinds of issues as the principle of procreative beneficence, which Pennings also cites. This response then considers the possibility of damaging upshots if Pennings's arguments were read uncritically.
Related Concept Videos
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Limits to Natural Selection
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...

