Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

126
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
126
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

296
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
296
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

209
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
209
Ranks01:02

Ranks

286
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
286
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

712
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
712
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

86
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
86

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncertainty quantification in cost-effectiveness analysis for stochastic-based infectious disease models: Insights from surveillance on lymphatic filariasis.

Journal of theoretical biology·2025
Same author

Unfolding the Network of Peer Grades: A Latent Variable Approach.

Psychometrika·2025
Same author

A new Bayesian method for the estimation of emergency nurses' thresholds and agreement in the context of telephone triage.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Let's Take a NAP! Neuropsychological Awareness in Pediatrics (NAP): proposal of a new cognitive self-report questionnaire for pediatric Multiple Sclerosis patients.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2025
Same author

Value of Information for Clinical Trial Design: The Importance of Considering All Relevant Comparators.

PharmacoEconomics·2024
Same author

Are anxiety, depression, and stress distinguishable in Italian adolescents? an examination through the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21.

PloS one·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Bayesian Nonparametric Models for Multiple Raters: A General Statistical Framework.

Giuseppe Mignemi1, Ioanna Manolopoulou2

  • 1https://ror.org/05crjpb27Bocconi Institute for Data Science and Analytics, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Psychometrika
|August 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a flexible Bayesian nonparametric model to analyze rating data, improving accuracy by accounting for rater variability and subject heterogeneity. The new framework enhances the estimation of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for better rating quality assessment.

Keywords:
Bayesian hierarchical modelsBayesian mixture modelsBayesian nonparametric modelsintraclass correlation coefficientrating models

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Bayesian Nonparametrics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Rating procedures are vital in education, clinical settings, and emergency services, but rater variability poses challenges.
  • Estimating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is crucial for assessing rating quality, yet it can be affected by subgroups, context, and subject heterogeneity.
  • Existing parametric multilevel models make strong distributional assumptions, limiting flexibility in handling heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a more flexible Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) model for analyzing rating data.
  • To naturally account for heterogeneity among raters and subjects, improving estimation accuracy.
  • To develop a general BNP heteroscedastic framework for continuous and coarse rating data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing hierarchical discrete nonparametric priors within a Bayesian nonparametric framework.
  • Developing a general BNP heteroscedastic model to analyze rating data.
  • Employing a stick-breaking representation of priors to derive ICC indices.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model accommodates clusters among raters and subjects, naturally handling heterogeneity.
  • Improved accuracy in estimates of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
  • Independent identification of latent similarities between subjects and raters.

Conclusions:

  • The BNP framework offers a flexible alternative to parametric models for rating analysis.
  • The method enhances the assessment of rating quality and can be applied to personalized interventions in precise education.
  • The study provides theoretical results, computational strategies, and demonstrates application with simulations and real-world data.