Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Storing summary patient data as a microcomputer file.

D R Hannay, S Mitchell

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

|November 1, 1985

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Real-World Performance of Sotatercept in PAH Patients With Cardiopulmonary Comorbidities: A Retrospective Single Center Experience.

Pulmonary circulation·2025

Same author

Corrigendum to "Mangrove preservation could have significantly reduced damages from Hurricane Otis on the coast of Guerrero, Mexico" [Sci. Total Environ. (2024), 177822].

The Science of the total environment·2025

Same author

Mangrove preservation could have significantly reduced damages from Hurricane Otis on the coast of Guerrero, Mexico.

The Science of the total environment·2024

Same author

Convergent Active Site Evolution in Platinum Single Atom Catalysts for Acetylene Hydrochlorination and Implications for Toxicity Minimization.

ACS catalysis·2024

Same author

Estimated Investment Need to Increase England's Capacity to Diagnose Eligibility for an Alzheimer's Treatment to G7 Average Capacity Levels.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024

Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024

Same journal

Welcome.

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2009

Same journal

Analysis of diuretics and thiazide-induced diabetes in general practice.

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2009

Same journal

An unusual case of anaemia with neurological and psychiatric features.

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2009

Same journal

Work load in general practice.

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2009

Same journal

A framework of health care.

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2009

Same journal

Correspondence.

The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2009

See all related articles

Summarizing patient records for microcomputer data entry is time-consuming, averaging 25 minutes per patient. Data input takes 3-5 minutes, with complex records requiring more time and errors noted in record-keeping.

Area of Science:

Health Informatics
Primary Care Management
Medical Record Keeping

Background:

Efficient patient record management is crucial for healthcare delivery.
Digitalization of health records presents challenges in time and accuracy.
Primary health centers manage large patient populations requiring effective data systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the time efficiency of summarizing patient records for microcomputer data entry.
To assess the accuracy and completeness of patient data within a primary health center setting.
To identify challenges in digitizing health records from paper-based systems.

Main Methods:

Study conducted in a health center serving approximately 7300 patients.
Evaluation of time required to summarize patient records and input data into a microcomputer.

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of error rates and missing information in A4 patient folders over six months.

Main Results:

Average time to prepare/update summary sheets: 25 minutes per patient.
Average time for data input: 3-5 minutes per patient.
10% of records were complex, requiring more summarization time; 9% error rate in age-sex register; 5% of folders lacked crucial information.

Conclusions:

Summarizing and inputting patient records into microcomputers is a labor-intensive process.
Significant time investment is required, particularly for complex records.
Errors and missing information highlight the need for improved data management protocols in primary care.