Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Paternalism modernised.

G B Weiss

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Modern paternalism balances physician expertise with patient values for optimal benefit. While patient autonomy is key, physician-guided decisions considering patient interests remain crucial for maximizing health outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Current status of functional foods in the United States.

    Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica·1998
    Same author

    Evidence that BKCa channel activation contributes to K+ channel opener induced relaxation of the porcine coronary artery.

    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·1995
    Same author

    New and improved titles.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·1995
    Same author

    Metabolism and actions of CDP-choline as an endogenous compound and administered exogenously as citicoline.

    Life sciences·1995
    Same author

    Rapid reversal of angiotensin I-induced contractions in rat carotid arteries after acute and chronic treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, 3-[(5-amino-1-carboxy-1S-pentyl)amino]2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2-oxo- 3S-1H-1-benzazepena-1-acetic acid (CGS 16617).

    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics·1993
    Same author

    Asymptomatic unilateral papilledema in pseudotumor cerebri.

    Journal of clinical neuro-ophthalmology·1992
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Doctor-Patient Relationship
    • Health Psychology

    Background:

    • Paternalism in medicine has evolved with advancements in various scientific and philosophical fields.
    • Physicians now recognize patient values as integral to determining the best course of treatment.
    • The traditional view of paternalism is shifting towards a more nuanced approach.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the evolution and current practice of medical paternalism.
    • To differentiate between the paternalistic and autonomy models in doctor-patient relationships.
    • To highlight the role of patient values in contemporary medical decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of medical ethics principles.
    • Review of historical and contemporary perspectives on paternalism.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachPhilosophical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of the autonomy and paternalistic models.

    • Main Results:

    • Modern paternalism integrates patient values as a significant factor, not the sole determinant, in medical decisions.
    • The autonomy model prioritizes patient values as decisive.
    • Physician-led decision-making, informed by patient values, aims for maximum patient benefit.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite challenges in empathy, modern paternalism offers a framework for optimizing patient outcomes.
    • Understanding the interplay between physician judgment and patient values is essential.
    • The practice of paternalism continues to adapt to ethical and scientific progress.