Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
6.6K
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence's Role in Developing Research Questions in Head and Neck Reconstruction
Sebastian Holm1,2, Mario Zambrana1, Juan E Berner3
1From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|August 12, 2025
Summary
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT and Gemini can generate novel research ideas for systematic reviews in head and neck reconstruction. These AI models effectively identify clinically relevant topics, aiding researchers in discovering new areas for study.
Area of Science:
- Medical research methodology
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare
- Reconstructive surgery
Background:
- Generative artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini are emerging technologies.
- While clinical applications of AI are discussed, its role in research development is less evaluated.
- The potential of AI in generating novel research ideas for systematic reviews (SRs) remains underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the role of ChatGPT and Gemini in generating novel and clinically relevant research ideas (RIs) for SRs.
- To evaluate the novelty of AI-generated RIs in the field of head and neck reconstruction.
- To compare the effectiveness of ChatGPT and Gemini in this research ideation process.
Main Methods:
- ChatGPT and Gemini were prompted to generate 10 RIs each for SRs in head and neck reconstruction domains.
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase to assess RI novelty.
- AI-generated RIs were screened against existing SRs to determine novelty and clinical relevance.
Main Results:
- A total of 60 RIs were generated by both AI models.
- Literature search identified 50 studies partially addressing the AI-generated RIs.
- Out of 60 RIs, 42 were found to be novel (not previously studied).
- No statistically significant difference in performance was observed between ChatGPT and Gemini.
- AI-generated RIs were generally broad but clinically relevant.
Conclusions:
- Both ChatGPT and Gemini can effectively generate novel and clinically relevant research ideas for SRs.
- AI has the potential to assist researchers in identifying new research avenues, particularly in complex fields like head and neck reconstruction.
- Further research may explore refining AI prompts for more specific and targeted research questions.

