Most eligible candidates for primary tumor resection among metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a SEER-based population analysis
- Cheng-Wu Jin 1, Sun-Yuan Lv 1, Can Yang 1, Mao Tan 1, Vishal G Shelat 2, Peter C Ambe 3, Timothy Price 4, Li Song 1, Wei Peng 1, Shu-Lang Jian 1, Heng Liu 1
- Cheng-Wu Jin 1, Sun-Yuan Lv 1, Can Yang 1
- 1Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
- 2Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
- 3Department of Surgery II, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
- 4Department of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia.
- 0Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This study developed a predictive model to identify metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who benefit most from primary tumor resection (PTR). The model accurately predicts eligibility, aiding clinical decision-making for improved patient outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Biostatistics
Background
- Primary tumor resection (PTR) offers survival benefits for select metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.
- Identifying optimal candidates for PTR remains a clinical challenge.
Purpose Of The Study
- To develop and validate a predictive model for identifying mCRC patients most likely to benefit from PTR.
- To improve patient selection for PTR and enhance treatment efficacy.
Main Methods
- Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics between surgical and non-surgical groups.
- Multivariate Cox analysis identified prognostic factors; logistic regression built the predictive model.
- Model validation included calibration curves, ROC analysis (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Main Results
- A total of 11,763 mCRC patients were analyzed; 8,808 underwent PTR.
- PSM showed significantly improved median cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the surgical group (29 months vs. 16 months).
- The validated predictive model, incorporating 10 covariates, demonstrated good accuracy (AUC 0.727 training, 0.742 validation).
Conclusions
- A robust predictive model was successfully constructed and validated for PTR in mCRC.
- The model accurately identifies patients likely to benefit from PTR, supporting clinical decision-making.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

