Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cardiac Output I:Effect of Heart Rate on Cardiac Output01:19

Cardiac Output I:Effect of Heart Rate on Cardiac Output

1.3K
Cardiac Output
Cardiac output (CO) refers to the total amount of blood ejected by one of the ventricles in liters per minute (L/min). In a resting adult, CO ranges from 5 to 6 L/min, adjusting according to the body's metabolic requirements.
Effect of Heart Rate on Cardiac Output
Cardiac output adapts to metabolic demands during stress, physical activity, or illness. The autonomic nervous system regulates heart rate via the sinoatrial node. The parasympathetic nervous system decreases heart...
1.3K
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output01:22

Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output

1.4K
Cardiac output (CO), the amount of blood the heart pumps per minute, is a parameter in cardiovascular physiology determined by stroke volume and heart rate. Stroke volume, the amount of blood pushed from one of the ventricles per heartbeat, is influenced by preload, afterload, and contractility.
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
1.4K
Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume01:11

Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume

3.2K
Cardiac output (CO) is an integral aspect of human physiology, reflecting the heart's efficiency and responsiveness to the body's needs. It represents the volume of blood that the left or right ventricle ejects into the aorta or pulmonary trunk each minute. The CO is calculated by multiplying the heart rate (HR)—the number of heartbeats per minute—by the stroke volume (SV)—the amount of blood pumped out with each heartbeat.
In an average resting adult male, the typical cardiac...
3.2K
Exercise and Cardiac Output01:17

Exercise and Cardiac Output

1.3K
Regular physical activity is essential for maintaining cardiovascular health, with aerobic exercises being particularly effective. According to the American Heart Association, 150 minutes of moderate to intense aerobic exercise per week is recommended for a healthy heart. Aerobic activities may include brisk walking, running, bicycling, cross-country skiing, and swimming, ideally performed three to five times per week.
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
1.3K
Pulse01:05

Pulse

2.4K
The pulse is one of the most fundamental physiological indicators of the body's cardiovascular health. It is the rhythmic expansion and contraction of the arterial walls in response to the pressure generated by the heart's pumping action.
Pulse Rate and its Significance
Pulse rate, often measured in beats per minute (bpm), reflects the heart rate (HR), which is influenced by numerous factors such as stress, physical activity, and hormonal changes. A normal resting adult pulse rate falls...
2.4K
Imbalances in Cardiac Output01:26

Imbalances in Cardiac Output

1.5K
The heart's primary function is to pump blood throughout the body, maintaining a balance between blood sent out (cardiac output) and blood returning (venous return). If this balance is disrupted, it can result in congestive heart failure (CHF), a severe condition where the heart becomes an inefficient pump, leading to inadequate blood circulation.
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Different Methods for the Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies-A Simulation Study.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Intraoperative Cardiac Events During Pediatric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Under Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Noninvasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Anesthesia.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Preoperative Cannabis Use and Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery.

Anesthesiology open·2026
Same author

Burnout and Work-Life Balance: A Longitudinal Study Into the Transition From Medical School to Postgraduate Training.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Cardiac Output Calculation by Thermodilution in Pigs for Effective Perfusion Flow During EVLP
06:10

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Cardiac Output Calculation by Thermodilution in Pigs for Effective Perfusion Flow During EVLP

Published on: June 28, 2024

623

Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Cardiac Output Method Comparison Studies (COMPARE) Statement.

Bernd Saugel1, Alexander Hapfelmeier2, Moritz Flick3

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Outcomes Research Consortium, Houston, Texas.

Anesthesiology
|August 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardizing cardiac output (CO) method comparison studies is crucial for accurate global blood flow measurement. The COMPARE checklist offers a framework to improve the reporting and validity of these essential cardiovascular validation studies.

More Related Videos

Cardiac Response to β-Adrenergic Stimulation Determined by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis
08:05

Cardiac Response to β-Adrenergic Stimulation Determined by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis

Published on: May 19, 2021

3.7K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
08:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems

Published on: August 2, 2024

982

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Cardiac Output Calculation by Thermodilution in Pigs for Effective Perfusion Flow During EVLP
06:10

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Cardiac Output Calculation by Thermodilution in Pigs for Effective Perfusion Flow During EVLP

Published on: June 28, 2024

623
Cardiac Response to β-Adrenergic Stimulation Determined by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis
08:05

Cardiac Response to β-Adrenergic Stimulation Determined by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis

Published on: May 19, 2021

3.7K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
08:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems

Published on: August 2, 2024

982

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Medical Device Validation

Background:

  • Cardiac output (CO) is a critical measure of global blood flow.
  • Validation studies assess the performance of CO monitoring methods against reference standards.
  • Method comparison studies are vital for evaluating the accuracy of CO measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the StatistiCal analysis and repOrting of cardiac output Method comPARison studiEs (COMPARE) statement.
  • To provide a standardized framework for designing, conducting, and reporting CO method comparison studies.
  • To enhance the quality and external validity of CO validation research.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the COMPARE statement, a framework for CO method comparison studies.
  • Inclusion of a 29-item checklist for essential reporting elements.
  • Focus on agreement analysis between test and reference CO measurement methods.

Main Results:

  • The COMPARE statement offers a structured approach to CO validation studies.
  • The checklist identifies 29 essential reporting items for method comparison studies.
  • Adherence to the checklist promotes standardization and improves result interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing the COMPARE checklist standardizes the reporting of cardiac output method comparison studies.
  • Standardized reporting enhances the reliability and external validity of CO measurement validation.
  • The COMPARE statement serves as a key resource for researchers in cardiovascular monitoring.