Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cell Specific Gene Expression01:58

Cell Specific Gene Expression

4.8K
4.8K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

286
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
286

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SATB1 is a targetable modulator of JAK-STAT signaling and cytokines in human Treg and Tconv cells.

EMBO reports·2026
Same author

DUSP1 is a Key Driver of Disease Persistence and Potential Therapeutic Target in Hairy Cell Leukemia.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Critical evaluation of drug response prediction models with DrEval.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Drugst.One DREAM-Drug repurposing through expert annotation and modification.

British journal of pharmacology·2026
Same author

SATB1 is a targetable modulator of JAK-STAT signaling and cytokines in human Treg and Tconv cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Correction: Maurer et al. Gut Microbial Disruption in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis. <i>J. Fungi</i> 2022, <i>8</i>, 1265.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

STED: flexible cross-modal topic modeling infers cell-type-specific regulatory landscapes from bulk epigenomics.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A knowledge-guided deep learning framework for quantitative nucleic acid testing.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Optimal transport for label transfer in single-cell multi-omics integration.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating completeness, coherence, and consistency of genome-scale function annotations.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Transformers for single-cell RNA sequencing: a survey.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.6K

Single-cell differential expression analysis between conditions within nested settings.

Leon Hafner1, Gregor Sturm2,3, Sarah Lumpp4

  • 1Data Science in Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Maximus-von-Imhof-Forum 3, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|August 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Differential expression analysis on single-cell RNA sequencing data requires careful method selection. Pseudobulk methods like DESeq2 perform comparably to specialized single-cell methods, offering better efficiency for individual datasets.

Keywords:
benchmarkdifferential expression analysissingle-cell atlas

More Related Videos

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

5.8K
Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
09:58

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis

Published on: June 27, 2020

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.6K
Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

5.8K
Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
09:58

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis

Published on: June 27, 2020

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Single-cell transcriptomics enables gene expression analysis at the individual cell level.
  • Standard differential expression analysis often assumes statistical independence, which is violated by pseudoreplication in single-cell data, leading to reduced robustness and reproducibility.
  • This violation can result in an inflated type 1 error rate, necessitating robust analytical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and benchmark various differential expression analysis methods for single-cell data.
  • To provide recommendations for method selection based on performance and runtime across diverse analytical scenarios.
  • To evaluate the utility of conventional pseudobulk methods versus specialized single-cell methods.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarking of multiple differential expression analysis tools including DESeq2, MAST, DREAM, scVI, permutation tests, distinct, and t-tests.
  • Adaptation and inclusion of hierarchical bootstrapping for single-cell differential expression analysis.
  • Evaluation of methods on diverse single-cell datasets to assess performance and computational efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Differential expression analysis methods specifically designed for single-cell data did not consistently outperform conventional pseudobulk methods like DESeq2 on individual datasets.
  • Specialized single-cell methods often incurred significantly longer run times compared to pseudobulk approaches.
  • For large-scale atlas-level analyses, permutation-based methods demonstrated high performance but poor runtime efficiency, with DREAM offering a balance between quality and speed.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional pseudobulk methods are viable and often more efficient alternatives for differential expression analysis on individual single-cell datasets.
  • For large-scale analyses, permutation-based methods are powerful but computationally intensive; DREAM is recommended as a practical compromise.
  • The study provides essential guidelines for selecting appropriate differential expression analysis methods in single-cell genomics research.