Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

533
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
533

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Persistent hamstring overactivation during squats after surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions in an elderly, non-athletic population: A pilot study.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same author

Reduced paraspinal muscle endurance and electromyographic fatigability are associated with greater global spinal imbalance in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026
Same author

Spinal mobility and paraspinal muscle degeneration: a cross-sectional analysis from the Berlin Back Study.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026
Same author

Perioperative discontinuation of SGLT2-inhibitors and cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery: secondary analysis of two prospective observational cohort studies.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Exploratory analysis of the 2-year changes in knee cartilage thickness and transverse relaxation time (T2) in ACL-injured versus healthy participants.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2026
Same author

AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: An Overview of the Current State of Fusion Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: Is Fusion Necessary?

Global spine journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K

Assessing radiographic spinopelvic alignment parameters using motion capture.

Nicola Büttiker1, David Koch2, Annegret Mündermann3

  • 1Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Journal of Biomechanics
|August 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study developed a method to align motion capture spinopelvic alignment with radiography. Results show significant offsets, indicating a need for corrections when using motion capture for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) assessment.

Keywords:
Lumbar spinal stenosisMotion captureOffset correctionRadiographySpinopelvic alignment

More Related Videos

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.3K
Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
06:28

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

650

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.3K
Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
06:28

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

650

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Radiographic imaging is standard for spinopelvic alignment but may not reflect symptom severity in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) due to compensatory strategies.
  • Dynamic assessment of spinopelvic alignment is crucial for understanding patient function in LSS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a method for aligning static spinopelvic alignment parameters derived from motion capture with radiographic definitions.
  • To assess the postural agreement and angular deviations between motion capture and EOS radiography.

Main Methods:

  • 27 LSS patients underwent simultaneous EOS radiography and motion capture analysis with markers on identical anatomical landmarks.
  • Offset angles were calculated to align motion capture data with radiographic parameters.
  • Bland-Altman analysis and trigonometric analysis were used to assess postural agreement and angular deviations.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences were observed between radiographic and motion capture parameters, notably a 31.1° average offset in sacral slope.
  • Mean vertical ASIS-PSIS distance was -3.3 mm and mean horizontal SACR-C7 distance was +4.9 mm.
  • Maximum angular deviations reached 5.9° for sacral slope and 3.7° for spine inclination.

Conclusions:

  • Large offset ranges necessitate individual corrections for accurate spinopelvic alignment using motion capture compared to radiography.
  • The method's ability to closely replicate EOS posture suggests potential for dynamic spinopelvic alignment assessment in LSS patients.