Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025
Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews of School-Based Nutrition Interventions to Determine Outcomes Used and Their
Dilara Olgacher1, Sarah Aldukair1, Mike Clarke1
1Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom.
Context:
School-based nutrition interventions have the potential to promote dietary behaviors and other outcomes among children and adolescents. However, inconsistent reporting of outcomes and measurement tools limits evidence synthesis and the identification of effective intervention strategies.
Objective:
This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the range of outcomes related to diet, health, well-being, and education reported in systematic reviews of school-based nutrition interventions, along with the measurement tools used. The findings will be used to inform the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) to guide future evaluations in this field.
Data Sources:
We conducted a systematic search across 7 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus) to identify systematic reviews published from January 2018 to December 2023.
Data Extraction:
Data on outcomes related to diet, health, well-being, and education were extracted from eligible systematic reviews. When available, information on outcome measurement tools was also extracted. Additional details were retrieved from primary studies referenced within systematic reviews as needed.
Data Analysis:
Ninety-eight systematic reviews, comprising 965 unique studies, were included. Outcomes were categorized into 4 domains: (1) "diet" (68.8%), subdivided into "dietary intake" and "diet-related cognitive/attitudinal behaviors"; (2) "physical health" (44.8%), subdivided into "body composition" and "clinical/biochemical measures"; (3) "social and emotional well-being and behavior" (9.2%); and (4) "education" (6.4%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across outcome domains, subdomains, and measurement tools, which presents challenges for evidence synthesis and limits comparability across studies.
Conclusions:
The findings of this review underscore the need for a stakeholder-informed, context-aware COS to standardize outcome reporting in school-based nutrition interventions. Such standardization is essential to improve the comparability of research findings, enhance evidence synthesis, and facilitate the translation of evidence into policy and practice. Subsequent phases of this work will involve diverse stakeholder engagement to finalize the COS and recommend appropriate tools for outcome measurement for evaluating school-based nutrition interventions.
Systematic Review Registration:
PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022378746.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
01:30Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...