Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
Cerebral perfusion mismatch: challenging the validity of cerebral vascular resistance index in orthostatic stress
Shigehiko Ogoh1, Hayato Tsukamoto2, Erika Iwamoto3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Asaka, Japan.
Insights
The cerebral vascular resistance index (CVRi) may inaccurately estimate cerebral blood flow during orthostatic stress. Researchers should consider its limitations when cerebral perfusion pressure deviates from systemic blood pressure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Cerebrovascular Regulation
- Autonomic Nervous System Function
Background:
- Cerebral vascular resistance index (CVRi) is commonly used to assess cerebrovascular resistance.
- CVRi relies on systemic blood pressure, not cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), limiting its accuracy in reflecting pressure-flow dynamics.
- Orthostatic stress, like head-up tilt (HUT), alters CPP independently of heart-level blood pressure, making it a relevant condition to test CVRi validity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of CVRi in assessing cerebrovascular resistance during orthostatic stress induced by HUT.
- To compare CVRi with other vascular tone indices (CrCP, RAP, PI) during HUT.
- To investigate the discrepancy between CVRi and corrected CVRi during HUT.
Main Methods:
- Twenty healthy young participants underwent head-up tilt (HUT) to induce orthostatic stress.
- Measurements included vascular tone indices, CVRi, critical closing pressure (CrCP), resistance-area product (RAP), and pulsatility index (PI).
- Correlation analyses were performed on changes in CVRi and other indices between supine and HUT positions.
Main Results:
- HUT significantly increased CVRi and CrCP, but not RAP or PI.
- No significant correlations were found between changes in CVRi and other vascular indices during HUT.
- CVRi increased during HUT, while corrected CVRi (adjusted for hydrostatic pressure) significantly decreased.
Conclusions:
- CVRi has limitations in accurately estimating cerebral vascular resistance, especially when CPP deviates from systemic blood pressure.
- Physiological factors like hydrostatic pressure changes during orthostatic stress can lead to inaccuracies in CVRi.
- Researchers should be cautious when using CVRi in conditions where CPP may not directly reflect systemic blood pressure.
Abstract:
The cerebral vascular resistance index (CVRi), a single-parameter model based on systemic blood pressure rather than cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), is widely used to assess cerebrovascular resistance. However, it does not accurately reflect the pressure-flow/velocity relationships in the cerebral circulation, as cerebral blood flow (CBF) is primarily regulated by CPP. This study evaluated the validity of CVRi during orthostatic stress induced by head-up tilt (HUT), which alters CPP independently of arterial blood pressure at the heart level and CBF. Twenty young, healthy participants (aged 23 ± 3 yr) were included, and vascular tone indices, CVRi, critical closing pressure (CrCP), resistance-area product (RAP), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured during HUT. HUT significantly increased CVRi and CrCP (P ≤ 0.003) but did not affect RAP and PI (P ≥ 0.277). However, correlation analysis between changes in CVRi and other vascular indices (i.e., CrCP, RAP, and PI), calculated as the difference between HUT and supine positions, revealed no significant relationships (all r = 0.189-0.701; all P = 0.090-0.425). Moreover, the CVRi response to orthostatic stress differed from that of the corrected CVRi during HUT, which accounts for changes in hydrostatic pressure. Specifically, CVRi increased during HUT (P = 0.003), whereas corrected CVRi, adjusted for changes in hydrostatic pressure, significantly decreased (P < 0.001). These findings highlight the limitations of CVRi, which fails to account for deviations in CPP from systemic blood pressure or for other physiological factors (e.g., intracranial pressure), potentially leading to inaccuracies in estimating cerebral vascular resistance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY CVRi is a useful index for estimating cerebral vascular resistance, as it can be easily calculated using middle cerebral artery blood velocity and systemic blood pressure. However, the results of the present study suggest that, due to physiological variations, particularly conditions in which cerebral perfusion pressure deviates from systemic blood pressure (e.g., during orthostatic stress), CVRi may not accurately reflect true cerebral perfusion pressure. Researchers should be mindful of this limitation.
More Related Videos
04:20Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
Published on: October 1, 2019
11:26Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
Published on: December 10, 2014