Initial use of the Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P) in young children with disorders of consciousness

Morgan E Nitta1, Tyler Busch2, Stacy J Suskauer1

  • 1Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

PubMed

Insights

The Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P) effectively assesses responsiveness in children with disorders of consciousness (DoC) post-brain injury. The scale showed significant improvements, aiding in classifying DoC states and emergence from minimally conscious states.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Clinical Assessment Tools

Background:

  • Disorders of consciousness (DoC) in children following brain injury present significant assessment challenges.
  • Accurate assessment is crucial for guiding rehabilitation and predicting outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P) in assessing responsiveness in young children with DoC.
  • To determine if the CRS-P can track changes in responsiveness during inpatient rehabilitation.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective chart review of 18 pediatric patients (8 months to 6 years 10 months) admitted for brain injury rehabilitation.
  • Data included demographic information and Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P) scores at admission and discharge.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to compare CRS-P scores and identify significant changes.

Main Results:

  • CRS-P total scores significantly increased from admission to discharge (p < .001).
  • Auditory, visual, and motor subscales demonstrated sensitivity to change (p < .02).
  • Seven patients (just over one-third) emerged from a minimally conscious state (MCS), with functional object use being the initial indicator.

Conclusions:

  • The CRS-P is a valuable tool for classifying DoC states in pediatric brain injury.
  • The CRS-P effectively tracks improvements in responsiveness and emergence from MCS in young children.
  • Age at assessment did not significantly correlate with CRS-P scores, suggesting broad applicability.
Abstract