Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Replacement correction factors for photon and electron dose measurements.

B E Bjärngard, K R Kase

    Medical Physics
    |November 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    The AAPM Task Group 21 dosimetry protocol

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    NCRP Report no.180-management of exposure to ionizing radiation: NCRP radiation protection guidance for the United States.

    Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2019
    Same author

    Experience in implementing ICRP recommendations: IRPA's perspective on the role of the radiation protection professional.

    Annals of the ICRP·2012
    Same author

    Measurements of accelerator-produced leakage neutron and photon transmission through concrete.

    Health physics·2003
    Same author

    Doses near the surface during total-body irradiation with 15 MV X-rays.

    International journal of cancer·2002
    Same author

    Characteristics of bremsstrahlung in electron beams.

    Medical physics·2001
    Same author

    Modeling the output ratio in air for megavoltage photon beams.

    Medical physics·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Physics
    • Radiation Dosimetry

    Background:

    • The AAPM Task Group 21 dosimetry protocol utilizes separate "gradient correction factor" and "electron fluence correction factor" to derive the "replacement correction factor."
    • The theoretical basis for separating these two physical processes is questionable, particularly in the context of Fano's theorem.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the theoretical foundation and practical application of the correction factors used in the AAPM Task Group 21 dosimetry protocol.
    • To demonstrate the inadequacy of separating gradient and electron fluence corrections based on Fano's theorem.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical analysis based on Fano's theorem and radiation transport principles.
    • Examination of the conditions under which Fano's theorem holds and its implications for dosimetry corrections.

    Main Results:

    • The separation of gradient and electron fluence correction factors is theoretically unfounded.
    • Fluence variations in the radiation field necessitate corrections, but these effects are intertwined.
    • The rationale for specific corrections like "in-scattering" and "obliquity" is weak when gradients are present.

    Conclusions:

    • The AAPM Task Group 21 dosimetry protocol's approach to correction factors requires re-evaluation.
    • A unified approach to corrections is theoretically more sound when dealing with radiation field gradients.
    • The chosen correction factor values at the depth of maximum dose are inconsistent with radiation field characteristics.

    Related Experiment Videos