Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Barriers and Facilitators to Program Evaluation and Dissemination: A Qualitative Study to Inform Implementation
Laura E Balis1, Shelly Palmer1, Maryan Isack1
1Center for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, NE, USA.
Community organizations need better strategies to maintain evidence-based interventions after funding ends. This study identified key barriers and facilitators to program evaluation and dissemination, informing new technical assistance approaches.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Community Health
- Program Evaluation
Background:
- Implementation strategies often cease with funding, hindering long-term maintenance of evidence-based interventions in community settings.
- There is a critical need for implementation strategies that specifically address program evaluation and dissemination to ensure sustained intervention use.
- Understanding barriers and facilitators within community-based organizations is essential for developing effective maintenance strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore barriers and facilitators to program evaluation and dissemination in community-based organizations.
- To inform the development of targeted implementation strategies that support the long-term maintenance of evidence-based interventions.
- To identify community-based organizations' preferences for implementation support.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants.
- An interview guide, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs, was used to explore evaluation and dissemination.
- Data were analyzed using a rapid deductive approach aligned with the interview guide.
Main Results:
- Key barriers identified include challenges in reflecting and evaluating (e.g., data collection), limited available resources (e.g., organizational capacity), and insufficient organizational incentives and rewards (e.g., lack of recognition).
- Participants expressed a preference for ongoing consultation, practical tools or plans, problem-solving support, and opportunities for peer sharing.
- A technical assistance (TA) protocol, featuring monthly consultations and quarterly learning collaboratives, was developed based on these findings.
Conclusions:
- The identified barriers related to evaluation, resources, and incentives must be addressed to improve intervention maintenance.
- The developed TA protocol aims to build capacity among grantees for effective evaluation and dissemination.
- Further evaluation of the TA protocol is necessary to confirm its effectiveness in overcoming barriers and enhancing program maintenance in community settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
Social Facilitation
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Surveys
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

