Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Diagonal Method to Measure Synergy Among Any Number of Drugs
Published on: June 21, 2018
Drug-Drug Interactions and Combination Therapy Strategies of Amiodarone With Digoxin, Rivaroxaban, and Phenytoin
Youjun Chen1,2, Zhiwei Liu1,2, Yiming Li1,2
1Anhui Provincial Center for Drug Clinical Evaluation, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Background:
Amiodarone (AMI) is a potent inhibitor of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), as well as a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4. Concomitant administration of AMI with digoxin (DIG), rivaroxaban (RIV), or phenytoin (PHT) can significantly increase the exposure of the victim drugs. Elevated RIV exposure raises the risk of bleeding, whereas DIG and PHT have narrow therapeutic windows, potentially leading to severe toxicity when co-administered with AMI.
Purpose:
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was employed to simulate, validate, and predict the impact of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between AMI and DIG, RIV, or PHT on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of victim drugs. The findings aim to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing combination therapy regimens.
Methods:
PBPK models for AMI, RIV, and PHT were developed using PK-Sim, while the DIG model was adopted from previously published literature. DDI scenarios were simulated to assess exposure levels. Model performance was evaluated by comparing predicted plasma concentration-time (PCT) profiles and PK parameter values with clinical trial data from healthy subjects in previously published PK studies. Finally, dosing regimens for combination therapy were adjusted based on changes in exposure levels.
Results:
According to model simulations, when the perpetrator drug AMI was co-administered with DIG, RIV, or PHT following label-recommended dosing regimens, the steady-state exposure of the victim drugs increased by 79%, 38%, and 59%, respectively. Compared to monotherapy, reducing the doses of DIG, RIV, and PHT by 40%, 25%, and 45%, respectively, achieved similar steady-state concentrations.
Conclusions:
We have successfully developed PBPK models for AMI, RIV, and PHT. These models effectively simulate the DDIs that occur when AMI is co-administered with DIG, RIV, or PHT, thereby providing guidance for dosing regimens in clinical combination therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

