Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trying in the 21st century: An introduction to the special issue on effort.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Early visual modulation and selection predict saccadic timing during visual search: An ERP study.

Psychophysiology·2024
Same author

Increased repulsion of working memory representations in schizophrenia.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2020
Same author

Increased influence of a previously attended feature in people with schizophrenia.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2020
Same author

Posterior Parietal Cortex Dysfunction Is Central to Working Memory Storage and Broad Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K

Individual differences in first saccade latency predict overt behavior during search for a contour integration

Carly J Leonard1

  • 1University of Colorado Denver, Department of Psychology.

Visual Cognition
|August 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in how people move their eyes during visual search tasks, specifically first saccade latency, impact search accuracy and efficiency. Longer initial eye movement times can improve guidance, but this effect varies among individuals.

Keywords:
AttentionEye movementsIndividual DifferencesPerceptual Organization

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
09:03

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

45.8K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K
Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
09:03

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

45.8K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Saccadic eye movements are crucial for exploring the visual world, directing the fovea to gather detailed information.
  • Perceptual organization processes visual input outside the fovea to construct scene and object structure, including contours.
  • Contour integration task performance varies in clinical populations, but individual differences within the typical population are less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate individual variations in eye movement strategies during a contour integration search task within the typical population.
  • To determine if differences in eye movement behavior correlate with task performance, specifically search accuracy and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Participants searched for a closed-contour target composed of oriented Gabor patches.
  • Eye movements, including first saccade latency, accuracy, and number of fixations, were recorded and analyzed.
  • Within-subject performance variations across trials were examined in relation to saccadic behavior.

Main Results:

  • Significant individual variation was observed in first saccade latency.
  • First saccade latency positively correlated with first saccade accuracy and inversely with the total number of fixations required.
  • While within-subject performance changes mirrored these effects, the impact of altered first saccade latency on saccadic behavior varied across participants.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in first saccade latency significantly influence visual search performance in contour integration tasks.
  • Longer first saccade latency may benefit eye movement guidance, potentially through enhanced recurrent processing or individual attentional spreading abilities.
  • These findings highlight the heterogeneity of typical visual search strategies and their underlying mechanisms.