The predictive value of SOFA and APSIII scores for 28-day mortality risk in SIMI: a cohort study based on the

Chang Liu1, Hao Wang1, Chenyang Liu1

  • 1Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Insights

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII) effectively predict mortality in sepsis-induced myocardial injury (SIMI). These scores aid in identifying high-risk patients for timely clinical intervention.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Prognostic Biomarkers

Background:

  • Sepsis-induced myocardial injury (SIMI) is a critical complication of sepsis.
  • Accurate prognostic scoring systems are essential for managing SIMI patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically identify and evaluate scoring systems for predicting prognosis in patients with SIMI.
  • To assess the performance of various scoring systems in predicting 28-day mortality.

Main Methods:

  • Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database.
  • Logistic and Cox regression analyses identified risk factors for 28-day mortality.
  • Prognostic performance was evaluated using ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier survival, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Main Results:

  • Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII) were identified as independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in SIMI patients.
  • SOFA (AUC=0.685) and APSIII (AUC=0.683) demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to other scoring systems.
  • DCA confirmed that SOFA and APSIII provided better net benefit for risk stratification.

Conclusions:

  • SOFA and APSIII scores are effective tools for identifying high-risk patients with SIMI.
  • These validated scoring systems offer evidence-based support for early clinical interventions in SIMI management.

Related Concept Videos

Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
135
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
661
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
23