Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

86
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
86
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

126
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
126

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Atrophy in preclinical Alzheimer's disease maps to a network that predicts longitudinal decline.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Widespread synaptic density loss in schizophrenia follows molecular and network architecture.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Molecular and cellular correlates of human cortical lateralization.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Individual-specific resting-state networks predict language dominance in drug-resistant epilepsy.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Widespread use of invalid statistical tests in biomedical machine learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Developing a multi-modal neuroimaging-based BrainAge model across childhood.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

894

Multilayer meta-matching: Translating phenotypic prediction models from multiple datasets to small data.

Pansheng Chen1,2,3,4, Lijun An1,2,3,4, Naren Wulan1,2,3,4

  • 1Centre for Sleep & Cognition & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Imaging Neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
|August 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New meta-matching techniques improve prediction of traits from brain scans in small datasets. Multilayer meta-matching, using multiple data sources, outperforms previous methods and classical approaches for resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) analysis.

Keywords:
functional connectivitymeta-learningneuroimagingphenotypic predictiontransfer learning

More Related Videos

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

652
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

894
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

652
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is a key neuroimaging measure for predicting individual phenotypic traits.
  • Large sample sizes enhance prediction accuracy, but small datasets are often necessary for clinical or specialized research.
  • Previous meta-matching approaches showed promise in transferring predictive models from large to small datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel meta-matching variants for improved prediction in small neuroimaging datasets.
  • To translate predictive models from multiple, diverse source datasets to small target datasets.
  • To compare the performance of new meta-matching strategies against existing methods and classical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two new meta-matching variants: 'meta-matching with dataset stacking' and 'multilayer meta-matching'.
  • Trained predictive models using five source datasets with varying sample sizes (862–36,834 participants).
  • Evaluated model performance by predicting phenotypes in the Human Connectome Project Young Adults (HCP-YA) and HCP-Aging datasets.

Main Results:

  • Multilayer meta-matching demonstrated modest performance gains over meta-matching with dataset stacking.
  • Both new variants significantly outperformed the original meta-matching approach using a single source dataset.
  • All meta-matching variants substantially outperformed classical Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) and standard transfer learning, especially in very small sample regimes (<50 participants).

Conclusions:

  • Multilayer meta-matching offers a robust strategy for leveraging multiple large datasets to enhance predictive modeling in small neuroimaging cohorts.
  • The proposed methods address the limitations of classical transfer learning and KRR when dealing with extremely limited data.
  • The multilayer meta-matching model is publicly available, facilitating broader application in neuroimaging research.