Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review
Lara Daniela Matos Cunha1,2,3, Filipa Ventura1,4, Márcia Pestana-Santos4,1
1Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Background:
Proficiency in clinical reasoning is crucial for achieving positive patient outcomes in healthcare. Nurses should take an active role in fostering their clinical reasoning skills. Bedside support strategies aim to offer practical, invaluable, and easily applicable resources for restructuring cognitive processes in situations of complex clinical demands.
Objective:
This review aimed to map evidence on bedside decision strategies applied by nurses to support clinical reasoning.
Methods:
The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations for scoping reviews.
Information:
Sources Studies were retrieved from Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, RCAAP (Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), and Google Scholar. Studies published in Portuguese, English, Spanish, or Swedish, without imposing geographical or cultural restrictions were considered. Qualitative and quantitative studies on bedside decision strategies that support nursing clinical reasoning were included, while studies exclusively focused on education, case-specific content, or Artificial Intelligence applications were excluded.
Results:
Out of 1889 results, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted in countries such as China, New Zealand, Norway, Brazil, Indonesia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia, involving nurses, patients, and healthcare teams, with study designs ranging from qualitative research and cohort studies to quasi-experimental and theoretical analyses.These studies identified two key strategies: normative (following guidelines) and reflective (based on critical self-reflection).
Conclusions:
Reflective strategies are widely used at the bedside, emphasizing the importance of adaptability in uncertain clinical environments. Despite Artificial Intelligence's role in clinical decision-making, fostering critical thinking and decision-making skills in nurses remains essential.
Registration:
OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H96VQ.
Tweetable Abstract:
A scoping review identified normative and reflective bedside strategies used by nurses to support clinical reasoning, highlighting the value of adaptability and critical thinking in complex care settings. #ClinicalReasoning #Nursing #PatientCare.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Critical Thinking II
01:13Patient-centered Care
01:24Critical Thinking I
01:18The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
01:27Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions