Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
Magnitude processing and integration entail perceptual processes independent from the task
Irene Togoli1,2, Olivier Collignon1,3, Domenica Bueti2
1Institut de recherche en sciences psychologiques (IPSY) et en Neurosciences (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Abstract:
The magnitude dimensions of visual stimuli, such as their numerosity, duration, and size, are intrinsically linked, leading to mutual interactions across them. However, it remains debated whether such interactions, or "magnitude integration" effects, arise from perceptual processes that are independent from the task performed, or whether they arise from high-level decision-making processes. We address this question with two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments in which participants watched a series of dot-array stimuli modulated in numerosity, duration, and item size, in two separate conditions. In the "magnitude task" condition, participants judged either the numerosity, duration, or size of each stimulus. In the "contrast task" condition, instead, a separate group of participants performed a contrast oddball task, never attending or judging the magnitude of the stimuli. The results of the magnitude task first show robust integration effects across the three dimensions. Then, we compare the neural responses to magnitude across the two task conditions. This comparison shows very similar brain responses irrespective of the task, within a series of latency windows whereby the modulation of response amplitude can predict the behavioral magnitude integration effect (~150 and ~250 ms post-onset for numerosity and size; ~300 ms post-offset for the effect of duration). To better assess the similarity of brain responses to magnitude irrespective of the task, we use a cross-condition multivariate decoding analysis. This analysis demonstrates that brain responses in the magnitude task can predict the responses in the contrast task, at multiple latencies starting from early processing stages (~120 ms). These results suggest that magnitude processing and integration likely involve perceptual processes that are engaged irrespective of the task, thus independently from decision making, although the effect of duration on other magnitudes may also involve post-perceptual processes such as working memory.
Related Concept Videos
Parallel Processing
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Gestalt Principles of Perception

