Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical technology assessment 1985.

H H Kaufman

    Neurosurgery
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Effective medical technology assessment is crucial due to imperfect evaluations. Enhancing technology assessment requires better coordination and a neutral oversight body for improved healthcare outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The expert witness. Neither Frye nor Daubert solved the problem: what can be done?

    Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2001
    Same author

    Prognosis of chronic subdural hematomas.

    Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2000
    Same author

    Prophylactic antibiotics with intracranial pressure monitors and external ventricular drains: a review of the evidence.

    Surgical neurology·1999
    Same author

    Laparoscopic-assisted distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

    Surgical neurology·1998
    Same author

    Intraparenchymal hemorrhage.

    New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)·1998
    Same author

    Massive osteolysis of the skull and upper cervical spine. Case report and review of the literature.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1997
    Same journal

    Electric-Scooters: An Emerging Source of High-Severity Pediatric Head Trauma.

    Neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Survival After Surgery for Spinal Osteosarcoma and the Role of Chemotherapy and Treatment Sequencing: A National Cohort Multivariable Analysis.

    Neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Safety and Efficacy of 3-Month Versus 6-Month Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Pipeline Embolization Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

    Neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Risk Factors of Revision Surgery After Acute Proximal Junctional Fracture Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

    Neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Sensorimotor Network Alterations and Compensation in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A 7 T Task-Based and Resting-State Functional MRI Study.

    Neurosurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Hyperselective Peripheral Neurectomy Versus Medical Therapy for Refractory Poststroke Spasticity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Neurosurgery·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Medical Technology Assessment
    • Health Policy

    Background:

    • Medical technology's effectiveness and efficiency are often compromised by inadequate prior assessment.
    • Significant scientific and financial implications arise from insufficient medical technology assessment.
    • Numerous governmental, professional, and private organizations are investigating medical technologies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe organizations involved in medical technology assessment.
    • To discuss challenges in evaluating the impact of these technologies.
    • To highlight the need for improved coordination and a national oversight body.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of activities by various governmental and private sector organizations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing approaches to medical technology assessment.
  • Identification of challenges in impact evaluation and work coordination.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple entities are engaged in investigating medical technologies.
    • Challenges exist in evaluating the impact and coordinating efforts.
    • Duplication of work is a concern in current technology assessment practices.

    Conclusions:

    • A neutral national oversight body is essential for effective technology assessment.
    • Broad societal input is needed for informed decision-making.
    • Increased efforts in technology assessment are required for optimal healthcare delivery.