Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

11:54
Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
Published on: October 20, 2019
9.2K
Maternal Mosaicism Challenges in Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis
Margot Comel1, Marina Lamairia1,2, Odile Boute3
1Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Montpellier, Occitanie, France.
Prenatal Diagnosis
|August 13, 2025
Summary
Maternal somatic mosaicism can interfere with non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders (NIPD-MD), affecting recurrence risk assessment. Early detection and clear communication are vital for informed reproductive choices.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Reproductive Medicine
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders (NIPD-MD) is crucial for detecting fetal genetic conditions.
- Exclusion-based NIPD-MD relies on detecting fetal-specific variants in maternal plasma.
- De novo pathogenic variants pose challenges for NIPD-MD due to the need for parental samples.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report the incidental finding of maternal somatic mosaicism during NIPD-MD development.
- To highlight the impact of maternal mosaicism on the feasibility of exclusion-based NIPD-MD.
- To emphasize the importance of pre-test evaluation for accurate genetic counseling.
Main Methods:
- Development of a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based exclusion NIPD-MD assay for four couples.
- Assay design focused on detecting fetal-specific variants in maternal plasma.
- Validation involved parental and proband samples, with retrospective analysis of maternal sequencing data.
Main Results:
- Maternal somatic mosaicism (3%-9%) was detected in 4 out of 70 cases (5.7%) during assay validation.
- The identified maternal mosaicism rendered NIPD-MD infeasible due to allele interference.
- Couples were informed of elevated recurrence risks, opting for invasive testing or ultrasound follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Maternal mosaicism presents a significant limitation for exclusion-based NIPD-MD.
- Accurate identification of maternal mosaicism is essential for reliable recurrence risk estimation.
- Sensitive detection methods, pre-test evaluation, and clear communication are critical for informed reproductive decisions.
Keywords:
cell free DNAcell free fetal DNAde novo variant exclusiondroplet digital PCRmaternal mosaicismnon‐invasive prenatal diagnosisMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Meiosis vs. Mitosis
58.2K
Cell division is necessary for growth and reproduction in organisms. Mitosis aids cell growth and development by dividing somatic cells. In contrast, meiosis causes the division of germ cells and plays an essential role in sexual reproduction. Due to their unique functional requirements, mitosis and meiosis differ from each other in multiple aspects.
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
58.2K
Nondisjunction
4.1K
Nondisjunction is the failure of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids to separate correctly and move to the opposite poles of the cells. This produces daughter cells with abnormal chromosome numbers. Nondisjunction is common during anaphase I or anaphase II of meiosis. Mutations in synaptonemal complex proteins that attach homologous chromosomes increase the chances of nondisjunction in anaphase I of meiosis I. In contrast, mutations in topoisomerases and condensins that hold...
4.1K

