Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver
Published on: June 27, 2025
Decoupling iterative algorithm for rapid calculation of physiological parameters from the standard Tofts model
Shu Chang1, Xiaobing Fan2, Ying Ma1
1College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Background:
The standard Tofts model (STM) is an important pharmacokinetic model for analyzing dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) data. However, it is very time-consuming using the STM to perform pixel-by-pixel analysis for 3D DCE-MRI data.
Purpose:
We developed a decoupling iterative algorithm, prediction-correction method (PCM), for rapid calculation of physiological parameters using the STM.
Methods:
The idea behind PCM is to eliminate the need to fit the entire contrast agent concentration (C(t)) as function of time (t) curve to calculate the volume transfer constant (Ktrans) and the volume fraction of the extravascular extracellular space (ve) using the STM. The early portion of C(t) was used to obtain Ktrans with prediced ve value, and the late portion of C(t) was used to obtain ve with predicted Ktrans. This procedure was iteratively performed until the changes of Ktrans and ve were less than the given tolerance errors. The method was first validated using the quantitative imaging biomarker alliance (QIBA) data. Then the public prostate DCE-MRI dataset that was scanned twice and the breast DCE-MRI dataset were used as applications of the PCM and compared with the conventional way of fitting the STM. The repeatability coefficients (RC) of the calculated parameters were also determined.
Results:
For QIBA data, there was an excellent agreement for calculating physiological parameters between the PCM and the conventional STM. For clinical data, there was a small percentage error (<10%) in the calculations of Ktrans and ve between the two methods and between two scans. Overall, the PCM was about 10 times faster than the STM for each pixel. The repeatability of calculating Ktrans and ve was similar between the PCM and STM.
Conclusion:
The PCM significantly accelerated the calculations of Ktrans and ve with an accuracy close to the STM. By using the PCM, the physiological parameters can be calculated rapidly for 3D DCE-MRI data to aid cancer diagnosis.
More Related Videos
04:20Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
Published on: October 1, 2019
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Fast Decoupled and DC Powerflow
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.