Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Degenerative Disc Disease I: Introduction01:27

Degenerative Disc Disease I: Introduction

Degenerative disc disease is a chronic condition in which intervertebral discs gradually lose structure and function. It is not infectious or autoimmune; rather, it results from age-related biochemical and mechanical changes, influenced by genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors.Structure and Function of DiscsThe spine contains 23 intervertebral discs that absorb load, distribute forces, maintain spacing, and allow flexibility. Each disc consists of a nucleus pulposus, a gel-like core...
Degenerative Disc Disease ll: Pathophysiology01:23

Degenerative Disc Disease ll: Pathophysiology

The symptoms of degenerative disc disease arise from a combination of mechanical compression, vascular compromise, and biochemical inflammation, which together disrupt nerve function and produce pain.Mechanical CompressionDisc degeneration reduces height and elasticity, predisposing to herniation of the nucleus pulposus, a major cause of radicular pain. Herniations may be protrusion (bulging with intact annulus), extrusion (nucleus extends beyond disc but remains connected), or sequestration...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of digital resources in surgical education: An analysis of YouTube videos on dynamic stabilization.

Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine·2026
Same author

Effects of Different Doses of Ranolazine on SIRT1, APELA, and APL13 in a Rat MCAO Model.

Current issues in molecular biology·2026
Same author

Turkish version of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain screening questionnaire for temporomandibular disorders: Its cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.

Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Lumbar Function and Muscle Preservation Following Hybrid Surgery Versus Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Preliminary Comparative Study.

Turkish neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Lumbar and Thoracolumbar Curves Are Associated with Coronal Lower Limb Malalignment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Pediatric cerebral sparganosis mimicking low-grade glioma in a nonendemic region: illustrative case.

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
10:09

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation

Published on: October 14, 2022

4.0K

Dynamic vs. Rigid: Transforming the Treatment Landscape for Multisegmental Lumbar Degeneration.

Caner Gunerbuyuk1, Mehmet Yigit Akgun1,2,3, Nazenin Durmus2

  • 1Spine Center, Koc University Hospital, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|August 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dynesys dynamic stabilization offers comparable pain relief and functional improvement to rigid fusion for multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease. This motion-preserving technique reduces adjacent segment disease risk, especially with a two-stage approach in older patients.

Keywords:
degenerative disc diseasedynamicmultisegmentstabilization

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
05:17

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published on: February 9, 2024

761
Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
05:52

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

194

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
10:09

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation

Published on: October 14, 2022

4.0K
Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
05:17

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published on: February 9, 2024

761
Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
05:52

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

194

Area of Science:

  • Spine Surgery
  • Degenerative Spine Disease
  • Orthopedic Biomechanics

Background:

  • Multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease (ms-LDD) is prevalent in older adults, often necessitating surgical intervention.
  • Rigid spinal fusion, while standard, carries risks like adjacent segment disease (ASD) and prolonged recovery.
  • The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system aims to stabilize the spine while preserving motion, but comparative data for ms-LDD is scarce.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus rigid stabilization in treating ms-LDD.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of a two-stage surgical approach for Dynesys in elderly and osteoporotic patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 53 patients with ms-LDD involving at least seven motion segments.
  • Patients received either Dynesys dynamic stabilization (n=27) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF, n=26).
  • Clinical outcomes (VAS, ODI) and radiographic parameters (LL, SVA, spinopelvic parameters) were assessed. A two-stage approach was used for the Dynesys group.

Main Results:

  • Both groups showed significant improvements in pain (VAS) and function (ODI) post-surgery (p < 0.001).
  • The Dynesys group demonstrated superior sagittal alignment correction, significantly increasing lumbar lordosis (LL) and decreasing sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p < 0.002 and p < 0.0015, respectively).
  • The Dynesys group experienced fewer complications, notably a lower incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) (0 vs. 6 cases), and the two-stage technique improved osseointegration in osteoporotic patients.

Conclusions:

  • Dynesys dynamic stabilization is a viable alternative to rigid fusion for ms-LDD, providing comparable functional outcomes and pain relief.
  • It effectively preserves spinal motion and reduces the risk of ASD, particularly beneficial for elderly and osteoporotic patients.
  • The two-stage surgical approach enhances stability and osseointegration, supporting long-term outcomes; further long-term studies are warranted.