Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Homogeneous Time-resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-based Assay for Detection of Insulin Secretion
Published on: May 10, 2018
Incorporating Uncertainty Estimation and Interpretability in Personalized Glucose Prediction Using the Temporal
Antonio J Rodriguez-Almeida1, Carmelo Betancort2, Ana M Wägner2,3
1Institute for Applied Microelectronics, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, ULPGC, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
None:
More than 14% of the world's population suffered from diabetes mellitus in 2022. This metabolic condition is defined by increased blood glucose concentrations. Among the different types of diabetes, type 1 diabetes, caused by a lack of insulin secretion, is particularly challenging to treat. In this regard, automatic glucose level estimation implements Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices, showing positive therapeutic outcomes. AI-based glucose prediction has commonly followed a deterministic approach, usually with a lack of interpretability. Therefore, these AI-based methods do not provide enough information in critical decision-making scenarios, like in the medical field. This work intends to provide accurate, interpretable, and personalized glucose prediction using the Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT), and also includes an uncertainty estimation. The TFT was trained using two databases, an in-house-collected dataset and the OhioT1DM dataset, commonly used for glucose forecasting benchmarking. For both datasets, the set of input features to train the model was varied to assess their impact on model interpretability and prediction performance. Models were evaluated using common prediction metrics, diabetes-specific metrics, uncertainty estimation, and interpretability of the model, including feature importance and attention. The obtained results showed that TFT outperforms existing methods in terms of RMSE by at least 13% for both datasets.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty: Overview
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

