Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Accuracy of Caregiver-Reported Height, Weight, and BMI in a Pediatric Growth Clinic
1Department of Pediatrics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Insights
Caregiver-reported height and weight measurements in children show minor inaccuracies but are suitable for growth clinic monitoring. Use cautiously for initial diagnosis or treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Growth Monitoring
- Clinical Data Accuracy
Background:
- Accurate anthropometric data is crucial for pediatric growth monitoring.
- Caregiver-reported measurements are increasingly used, especially in telemedicine.
- Previous studies show variability in caregiver-reported data accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy of caregiver-reported height, weight, and BMI in children at a pediatric growth clinic.
- To evaluate the impact of these measurement errors on clinical management and telemedicine.
- To compare caregiver-reported data with standard clinical measurements.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of 132 children (aged 6-12 years) at a pediatric growth clinic.
- Comparison of caregiver-reported height and weight with standard measurements taken within one week.
- Analysis of differences using Bland-Altman and linear regression, stratified by gender and age.
Main Results:
- Caregivers slightly overestimated height (+0.6 cm) and underestimated weight (-0.9 kg), leading to BMI underestimation (-0.6 kg/m²).
- Approximately 4.5% of overweight children were misclassified.
- Strong correlation (R² > 0.9) and good agreement found between caregiver and standard data, with minor discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- Caregiver-reported anthropometric data in pediatric growth clinics exhibit minor errors comparable to general pediatric populations.
- The data's strong correlation and agreement suggest suitability for follow-up monitoring.
- Caution is advised when using caregiver-reported data for initial diagnosis or therapeutic decisions.
Objective:
To evaluate the accuracy of caregiver-reported height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) in children attending a pediatric growth clinic, and to explore the impact of these errors on clinical management and telemedicine.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included 132 children aged 6-12 years attending a pediatric growth clinic. Caregivers reported their children's height and weight, and standard measurements were taken within one week. BMI was calculated for both sets of data. Differences between caregiver-reported and standard measurements were analyzed across gender and age. Bland-Altman and linear regression analyses assessed agreement and correlation.
Results:
Caregivers slightly overestimated height (+0.6 cm) and underestimated weight (-0.9 kg), resulting in an underestimation of BMI (-0.6 kg/m², p < 0.001). About 4.5% of overweight children were misclassified as non-overweight. Measurement errors showed no significant differences by gender or age group. Most caregivers measured their children's height and weight approximately once per month, regardless of subgroup. Despite minor discrepancies, caregiver-reported and standard data were strongly correlated (R² > 0.9). Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement, though height had slightly lower concordance.
Conclusion:
While caregiver-reported measurements exhibited minor errors, the magnitude was comparable to previous findings in general pediatric populations. Thus, caregiver-reported data may be suitable for follow-up monitoring in pediatric growth clinics but should be used cautiously for initial diagnosis or therapeutic decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Regression Toward the Mean
Signs of Puberty

