Spontaneous Resolution of Hemolysis After Ventricular Septal Defect Closure With an Amplatzer Device

Christophe Popelier1, Pieter De Meester1,2, Werner Budts1,2

  • 1Leuven, Congenital and Structural Cardiology UZ Leuven Leuven Belgium.

Clinical Case Reports
|August 14, 2025
PubMed

Insights

A conservative "wait and see" approach is viable for patients experiencing mechanical hemolysis post-percutaneous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure, regardless of the hemolysis cause.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Hematology

Background:

  • Percutaneous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure is a common procedure.
  • Mechanical hemolysis can occur as a complication after VSD closure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a "wait and see" approach for managing mechanical hemolysis after percutaneous VSD closure.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous VSD closure and developed mechanical hemolysis.
  • Assessment of hemolysis causes and patient outcomes under a conservative management strategy.

Main Results:

  • A "wait and see" approach was successfully employed in cases of mechanical hemolysis post-percutaneous VSD closure.
  • Hemolysis management was effective even when the underlying cause was heterogeneous.

Conclusions:

  • A conservative management strategy is appropriate for mechanical hemolysis following percutaneous VSD closure.
  • This approach can be maintained irrespective of the specific or homogeneous nature of the hemolysis etiology.

Related Concept Videos