Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Oral Administration of Rotenone using a Gavage and Image Analysis of Alpha-synuclein Inclusions in the Enteric Nervous System
Published on: October 26, 2010
Safety and efficacy of rotigotine in patients with frontotemporal dementia: a phase 2, double-blind, randomized,
Giacomo Koch1,2, Martina Assogna1, Yasmine Gadola3
1Department of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, 00179, Italy.
Background:
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common form of dementia with no approved pharmacological treatment. Clinical and experimental evidence suggest that dopaminergic transmission is impaired in FTD. Here we aimed at investigating the clinical impact of treatment with dopaminergic agonists in FTD.
Methods:
This was a phase IIa 24-week randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study, conducted in Italy from June 16th 2021 to April 30th 2023. Patients with a diagnosis of probable behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive rotigotine transdermal patches at 4 mg/24 h, rotigotine transdermal patches at 6 mg/24 h, or placebo transdermal patches for 24 weeks. Randomization was centralized and performed using a double-blind covariate-adaptive scheme. The primary outcome was analyzed in the intention-to treat (ITT) population. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the change at 24-weeks from baseline in the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The trial is completed and was registered on the clinicaltrial.gov website (NCT04937452).
Findings:
A total of 128 patients were screened, of which 75 were randomized. 25 patients were randomized to receive Rotigotine 4 mg, 26 patients to Rotigotine 6 mg, and 24 patients to placebo. The mean age of patients was 66.5 ± 8 of which 31 (41%) were female. A total of 69 patients (92%) completed the study. The estimated mean change from baseline at 24 weeks in the FAB score in the ITT population was 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.79 to 1.15) in the rotigotine 4 mg group, 0.89 (95% CI -0.09 to 1.88) in the rotigotine 6 mg group and 1.08 (95% CI 0.19-1.98) in the placebo group (rotigotine 4 mg vs placebo, -0.90; 95% CI -2.22 to 0.42; p = 0.18; rotigotine 6 mg vs placebo, -0.19; 95% CI -1.52 to 1.14; p = 0.77). No significant effect was found on secondary outcome measures. Adverse events were mild in all groups and more common in the rotigotine (4 mg: 4/25; 6 mg: 3/26) than in the placebo (1/24) group.
Interpretation:
Rotigotine administration may not be a viable therapeutic option for enhancing frontal function, slowing disease progression, mitigating functional decline or ameliorating behavioral disturbances in bvFTD patients. The current findings provide data in a large sample of bvFTD that might be useful for the design of future clinical trials.
Funding:
This trial was funded by a joint grant from the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF) and the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration (AFTD) grant to GK and BB (GFTD-201902-2017958).
Insights
Rotigotine did not improve frontal function in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) patients. This study suggests rotigotine is not a viable treatment option for bvFTD, offering insights for future clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Neurology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a prevalent dementia lacking approved treatments.
- Evidence suggests dopaminergic transmission deficits in FTD.
- Investigating dopaminergic agonists as a potential FTD therapy is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical impact of rotigotine, a dopaminergic agonist, in patients with probable behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD).
- To assess rotigotine's efficacy in improving frontal executive functions and behavioral symptoms in bvFTD.
Main Methods:
- A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIa study.
- 75 patients with probable bvFTD were randomized to receive rotigotine (4 mg or 6 mg) or placebo.
- The primary outcome was the change in the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score from baseline.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in FAB score changes was observed between rotigotine groups and placebo.
- Rotigotine treatment did not show significant effects on secondary outcomes.
- Adverse events were mild and slightly more frequent in rotigotine groups.
Conclusions:
- Rotigotine administration does not appear to be an effective therapeutic strategy for improving frontal function or behavioral disturbances in bvFTD.
- These findings provide valuable data for designing future clinical trials in FTD.
- Further research is needed to identify effective treatments for FTD.
More Related Videos
08:22Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: An Update on Safety and Tolerability
Published on: October 7, 2017
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025