Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
09:58
Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury
Published on: November 9, 2018
7.7K
Association Between Glasgow Coma Scale Trajectory and In-Hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury in the ICU: A
Yangchun Zhang1, Feng Chen1, Na Ma1
1Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Nursing in Critical Care
|August 14, 2025
Summary
Dynamic Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) trajectories in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients offer better prognosis than single GCS scores. These patterns, influenced by age and heart failure, guide nursing care and risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Neurological assessment
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- Critical Care Nursing
Background:
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is crucial for TBI neurological assessment.
- Static GCS measurements inadequately reflect TBI progression.
- Dynamic GCS assessment is needed for timely nursing interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze GCS dynamic trajectories in the first 24 hours post-TBI in ICU.
- To determine the association between GCS trajectories and in-hospital mortality.
- To inform nursing neurological assessment and care planning for TBI patients.
Main Methods:
- Identification of five distinct GCS trajectory groups within 24 hours of ICU admission.
- Statistical analysis of GCS patterns and their correlation with in-hospital mortality.
- Exploration of interactions between GCS trajectories, age, and heart failure status.
Main Results:
- Five GCS trajectory groups were identified: stable low (G1), stable intermediate (G2), stable medium-high (G3), stable high (G4), and increasing (G5).
- Mortality was significantly lower in G2-G5 compared to the stable low G1 group.
- Age and heart failure status significantly modified the GCS trajectory-mortality relationship (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Dynamic GCS trajectory analysis provides superior prognostic value over static GCS scores in TBI.
- Age and heart failure status are critical factors influencing GCS patterns and mortality risk.
- Recognizing neurological evolution patterns through GCS trajectories enhances TBI patient care planning and monitoring.

