Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Toward the standardization of radiopharmaceutical therapies: a technical note evaluating a clinical dosimetry
Taehyung Peter Kim1,2, Wendy Siman3, Vivek Mishra4
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA. tpk.kim@gmail.com.
Purpose:
The lack of standardized dosimetry workflows in lutetium-177 ( Lu) radiopharmaceutical therapies results in inconsistent absorbed doses and limits treatment planning. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and variability of a single-time-point 177Lu SPECT/CT commercial workflow to help harmonize its protocol.
Methods:
The dosimetry workflow evaluated in this study predominatly followed that of MIM SurePlanTM MRT. 177Lu SPECT/CT images of a Jaszczak and a NEMA phantoms were acquired in GE 670 DR scanner. Absorbed dose (Gy/MBq/s) was calculated in the background and sphere inserts with varied reconstruction iterations, calibrations, voxel-based dosimetry methods, and target volume segmentations. Ground truth absorbed doses were created using CT images and voxel S-value (VSV) water kernels. The validity of the density-corrected (DC) kernel for use in ground-truth dosimetry evaluations was further investigated. The accuracy and variability of the dosimetry workflow were evaluated using percent error and the coefficient of variation (CV) of mean absorbed doses.
Results:
Mean absorbed dose accuracy improved for both the voxel-based VSV and local deposition (LD) methods until 480 equivalent iterations for all target volumes. DC kernel was found viable for creating reference absorbed doses. The calibration CV was 5.18% when phantom and calibration regions were varied. The VSV method demonstrated absorbed doses that were 10 to 150% higher than those calculated with the LD method. The overall variability in absorbed dose reached up to 84% when reconstruction, calibration, dosimetry, and segmentation methods were varied.
Conclusions:
A single dosimetry workflow has demonstrated markedly large variability in absorbed dose accuracy. By evaluating the accuracy of absorbed dose, our study helped to propose a harmonized MIM SurePlanTM MRT workflow for single-time-point Lu SPECT/CT-based therapies.

