Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
Reference Values Derived From The 90+ Study: The Five Times Sit to Stand Test
Katherine A Colcord1,2, Nikki J Arnold3, Luohua Jiang1
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Irvine, California.
Background And Purpose:
Physical performance reference values play an important role in older adult care, yet data are extremely limited in individuals 90 years and older, the "oldest old." The Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5XSST) is a frequently used method of quantifying functional lower extremity strength. To improve the classification and interpretation of 5XSST scores, we aim to develop 5XSST reference values in individuals 90+ years.
Methods:
Participants are members of The 90+ Study, a longitudinal oldest-old cohort study. The current study is cross-sectional, using data from the first visit on which each participant completed the 5XSST. Participants performed the 5XSST with arms folded (traditional test) or using their arms to push from the chair (modified test). We calculated means, standard deviations, and percentiles (5 th , 10 th , 25 th , 50 th , 75 th , 90 th , 95 th ) by test type and age category. We used linear regression to compare mean scores by sex (men, women), age category (90-91, 92-94, 95+), test type (traditional, modified), living situation (home alone, home with another person, nursing home/assisted living), and falls in the past year (0, 1+).
Results And Discussion:
The 972 participants had a mean age of 93.0 years (range = 90.0-103.1, SD = 2.5). Of these, 64.8% performed the traditional test and 36.2% the modified test. Mean time for the traditional test was 16.2 seconds (SD = 6.3) and, for the modified test, 22.6 seconds (SD = 9.9). Scores were significantly slower in participants in the oldest age category, who performed the modified test, lived in a facility, or fell in the past year. No significant differences were found according to sex. We present 5XSST reference values in men and women by test type and age category. Previous studies in younger groups have reported faster 5XSST times than those from our 90+ cohort, which suggests using reference values established in younger groups to categorize the performance of oldest-old individuals is not optimal for accurate categorization of scores.
Conclusions:
The reference values we present will allow providers to correctly classify and interpret 5XSST scores in the rapidly growing group of individuals 90 years and older.
More Related Videos
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
08:40Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Calculating Standard Deviation
The standard deviation value is small when all the data is concentrated close to the mean. Here the data exhibits low variation. The standard deviation value is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean. Here, the data displays high variation.
Let us...
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height of...
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...