Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Open versus laparoscopic right colectomy: does the initial approach impact on management and outcomein anastomotic
Bernhard Dauser1, Christof Mittermair2, Hannes Hoi2
1General and Visceral Surgery Department, St. John of God Hospital, Johannes Von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria. bernhard.dauser@gmail.com.
Background:
Anastomotic leakage still represents the most feared complication in colorectal surgery. However, there is limited data focusing on management and how this affects outcome in case of leakage following open versus laparoscopic right colectomy. We, therefore, performed an observational multicenter study addressing this issue.
Methods:
Data of patients undergoing elective right colectomy for benign and malignant disease using an open or laparoscopic approach were collected in seven colorectal units among Austria between January 2010 and December 2019. Patients undergoing emergency surgery or suffering from Crohn's disease with chronic anastomotic fistula were excluded. Demographic, peri- and postoperative data were analyzed retrospectively.
Results:
During the study, a total of 3446 patients were operated on using an open (n = 2282, 66.2%) or laparoscopic (n = 1164, 33.8%) approach. Anastomotic leak rates accounted for 2.8% (65/2281) and 3.2% (37/1165), respectively (p = .588). Age at operation (p < .001), initial surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic; p = .034) and the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI; p < .001) at revision represented independent risk factors for mortality. We divided the surgical strategy during revision into three subgroups: suturing of leak (SD), formation of new anastomosis (NA) or fecal diversion with or without formation of new anastomosis (FD). SD, NA or FD had no influence on clinical outcome and mortality (p = .599). The initial approach had no influence on which strategy was used later, but time to revision was significantly shorter following initial laparoscopic resection (6.2 versus 8.8 days, p = .008). Leak-associated mortality was lower in the minimally invasive group (8.1% vs 23.1%; p = .057).
Conclusions:
Timing of revision and not the surgical strategy (± fecal diversion) has an impact on the clinical outcome of patients with a leak following right colectomy. An initial laparoscopic approach may lead to an earlier revision resulting in a lower mortality rate.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
07:51The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...