Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Voice Quality in Pediatric Dysphonia: Assessing Expert Rater Reliability Across Three Perceptual Methods
Supraja Anand1, Shaheen N Awan2, Yeonggwang Park2
1Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Objective:
As with adult voices, the reliability of Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) appears to vary widely for pediatric voices, especially for supraglottal voice sources (SGVS). The current study compared the reliability of estimates of breathy, rough, and strained voice qualities in pediatric dysphonic voices using laboratory-based methods, such as visual sort and rank (VSR) and magnitude estimation (ME), and the clinical CAPE-V method.
Methods:
A total of 124 samples (30 SGVS and 94 glottal vibratory source or GVS) from children aged 4 to 11 years were selected from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) database. Three expert listeners rated breathiness, roughness, and strain of 1000-ms /ɑ/ samples using VSR, ME, and CAPE-V. In the VSR task, experts were presented with subsets of voice samples and were encouraged to sort and rank them into a relative order by comparing each sample to another. In the ME task, experts assigned the voice quality magnitude a number between 1 and 1000.
Results:
High intra- and inter-rater reliability was observed for each of the perceptual measurement methods. For intra-rater reliability, the ME task provided the highest reliability across the two vibratory sources and the three voice quality dimensions. For inter-rater reliability, the ME task provided higher values for SGVS samples, while VSR provided higher values for GVS samples. There was also a strong relationship between the three methods with high correlations.
Conclusions:
Among three expert voice clinician-scientists, inter- and intra-rater reliability was similar for the offline CAPE-V assessment and the laboratory methods of VSR and ME. However, there appears to be a slight variation in absolute reliability values between the two vibratory sources. It is unclear how this highly controlled comparison extends to typical clinical practice. High reliability among expert professionals can potentially be translated to other clinicians and inexperienced listeners using superior ratio-level scaling procedures provided by the ME task.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:29Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract III: Percussion
Percussion in Respiratory Assessment
Percussion evaluates underlying tissue composition with audible and tactile vibrations,...
01:17Auditory Perception
01:28Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract IV: Auscultation
Breath Sounds
Breath sounds are categorized into vesicular, bronchovesicular, and bronchial.
01:21Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...