Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

06:37
Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
Published on: November 13, 2017
9.3K
The Utility of Fish Population Monitoring and Forecast Trigger Development for Designing Adaptive Aquatic Monitoring
Carolyn Jm Brown1,2, Tim J Arciszewski3, R Allen Curry2,4
1Department of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Environmental Management
|August 16, 2025
Summary
Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) often lack effective monitoring triggers due to insufficient baseline data. This study demonstrates developing fish population monitoring and forecast triggers for hydroelectric projects, highlighting data needs for accurate environmental assessments.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecology
- Hydroelectric Engineering
Background:
- Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) frequently lack robust monitoring and forecasting capabilities.
- This deficiency stems from inadequate baseline data, particularly for biotic endpoints.
- Effective environmental management necessitates improved data collection and predictive modeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the development of monitoring and forecast triggers using biotic data (fish populations).
- To assess the impacts of refurbishing the Mactaquac Hydroelectric Generating Station.
- To recommend strategies for establishing effective environmental monitoring and forecasting.
Main Methods:
- Utilized fish population data to develop monitoring and forecast triggers.
- Employed interim strategies like default critical effect sizes and data percentiles for limited datasets.
- Applied statistical models including general linear models, partial least squares regression, and elastic net regression for forecasting.
- Analyzed 4 years of consecutive fish population data.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that 4 years of interannual fish population variability was insufficient for developing meaningful monitoring and forecast triggers.
- Highlighted challenges in collecting sufficient baseline data for new projects due to time and cost constraints.
- Showcased methods for developing triggers based on predicted normal ranges (e.g., 2x standard deviation) with sufficient data.
Conclusions:
- Effective environmental monitoring and forecasting require substantial baseline biological data.
- Strategies for interim trigger development are necessary when data is limited.
- Coordinated monitoring requirements across watershed developments can enhance long-term prediction and management.

