Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

At the molecular level, visual signals trigger transformations in photopigment molecules, resulting in changes in the photoreceptor cell's membrane potential. The photon's energy level is denoted by its wavelength, with each specific wavelength of visible light associated with a distinct color. The spectral range of visible light, classified as electromagnetic radiation, spans from 380 to 720 nm. Electromagnetic radiation wavelengths exceeding 720 nm fall under the infrared category,...

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...

Color Vision

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Meta-analysis of defocus curves of monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus IOLs.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2025

Same author

A review of angle kappa and multifocal intraocular lenses and their effect on visual outcomes.

Acta ophthalmologica·2025

Same author

Ethnicity-Based Differences in Corneal Asphericity: Intraocular Lens Power Calculation, Image Quality, and Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery Using Eye Models.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025

Same author

[Alcohol Dependence: one or more nosological entities? Identifying geographical diversities among patients through DSM-4 and Artificial Intelligence].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2025

Same author

Impact of Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation on Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity: a Combined Analysis.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2024

Same author

Population mortality before and during the COVID-19 epidemic in two Sudanese settings: a key informant study.

BMC public health·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

Letter contrast sensitivity validation.

Michel Guillon¹, Pasquale Pepe¹, Jessie Hull²

¹Ocular Technology Group - International, London, UK.

Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)

|August 16, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The computerized letter contrast sensitivity (CS) test demonstrated high repeatability and lower test variance compared to sinusoidal methods. This validated its use for assessing functional vision across various conditions.

Keywords:

computerised letter test contrast sensitivity sinusoidal test test–retest repeatability

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Published on: February 18, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Published on: February 18, 2021

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Vision Science
Clinical Measurement

Background:

Contrast sensitivity (CS) is crucial for evaluating functional vision.
Assessing the full CS function requires evaluating multiple spatial frequencies.
Computerized tests offer a method to assess CS across various spatial frequencies.

Purpose of the Study:

To validate computerized letter and sinusoidal contrast sensitivity (CS) methods.
To determine the repeatability of CS measurements using different spatial frequencies and lighting conditions.

Main Methods:

A prospective study compared repeatability of CS measurements using three methods: computerized letter CS, computerized sinusoidal CS (M&S Technologies), and printed sinusoidal CS (VectorVision).
Measurements were taken under photopic and mesopic conditions (with/without glare).
Repeatability was assessed in 20 participants by comparing mean differences and 95% confidence intervals between visits.

Main Results:

Computerized letter CS showed significantly lower test variance than M&S or VectorVision instruments across most spatial frequencies.
Letter CS exhibited a lower precision-to-tolerance ratio and required a smaller sample size for comparable precision.
The computerized letter method demonstrated superior repeatability.

Conclusions:

The computerized letter method for assessing CS function is highly repeatable.
This method offers significantly lower test variance compared to sinusoidal instruments.
Computerized letter CS is a reliable tool for evaluating functional vision.