Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

547
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
547
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

152
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
152
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

406
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
406
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

341
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
341
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

1.6K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.6K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

519
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
519

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decomposing cultural differences in behavior toward members of different social groups.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Contributions of the Brain's Mentalizing Network to Inferences about Others' Stable and Transient Beliefs and Preferences.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Teaching Recombinable Motifs Through Simple Examples.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

A Role for Uncertainty in the Neural Distinction Between Social and Nonsocial Thought.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2022
Same author

Neural representations of others' traits predict social decisions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Empathy affects tradeoffs between life's quality and duration.

PloS one·2019
Same journal

Antagonism shapes social maps in the human brain.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Language markers of student beliefs signal college success.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the mental health correlates of swiping-based dating app use.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to conflicting self- and partner-directed feedback correlate with trait emotion regulation and daily support.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Emergence of collective mental time travel pathways upon remembering consequential elections.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Teams perform worse when newcomers hold critical information than when original group members do.

Communications psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

801

Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.

Huang Ham1,2, Adrianna C Jenkins3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. hamhuang@princeton.edu.

Communications Psychology
|August 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human reward-based learning slows with inequitable reward distribution and is influenced by social stereotypes. Learning is less successful when individuals receive smaller reward shares, especially from stereotyped partners.

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.5K
Chronic Stress Shifts Effort-Related Choice Behavior in a Y-Maze Barrier Task in Mice
09:37

Chronic Stress Shifts Effort-Related Choice Behavior in a Y-Maze Barrier Task in Mice

Published on: August 13, 2020

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

801
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.5K
Chronic Stress Shifts Effort-Related Choice Behavior in a Y-Maze Barrier Task in Mice
09:37

Chronic Stress Shifts Effort-Related Choice Behavior in a Y-Maze Barrier Task in Mice

Published on: August 13, 2020

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Reward-based learning is fundamental to how individuals acquire action-outcome associations.
  • Understanding how social factors, such as reward sharing and group identity, influence this learning is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of reward inequity and social group identity on human reward-based learning.
  • To determine if stereotypes about social groups affect learning from shared rewards.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments involving participants learning monetary reward associations under conditions of self-other reward splitting.
  • Manipulation of reward shares and partner's social group identity.
  • Computational modeling using adapted reinforcement learning frameworks.

Main Results:

  • Learning was slower and less successful when participants received a smaller share of the total reward.
  • Social stereotypes modulated learning rates, particularly under reduced cognitive load, with perceived lower warmth or competence hindering learning.
  • Computational models incorporating inequity and stereotype information best explained the observed learning patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Social context, including reward distribution inequity and group stereotypes, significantly modulates reward-based learning.
  • Learning processes are not purely individual but are dynamically shaped by social-cognitive factors.
  • Reinforcement learning models can be adapted to account for social influences on learning.