Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

10:35
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
18.3K
Definition and requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: a systematic review
Łukasz Kuncman1, Carolina De la Pinta2, Maaike T W Milder3
1Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland; Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland.
Summary
This review highlights significant variability in stereotactic radiotherapy definitions and quality standards. Updated guidelines are needed for consistent, high-quality patient care in radiation oncology.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
Background:
- Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is widely used in clinical practice.
- Existing definitions and quality standards for SRT show considerable international inconsistencies.
- There is a need to consolidate current practices and address variability in SRT implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and consolidate current definitions of stereotactic radiotherapy.
- To identify commonly proposed quality standards for SRT.
- To address inconsistencies in international SRT practices.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review following PRISMA methodology.
- Searches conducted across major databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Epistemonikos) from January 2001 to April 2024.
- Data extraction focused on definitions, staffing, technology, and quality assurance procedures for SRT.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 51 articles revealed significant discrepancies in SRT definitions and standards.
- Commonly proposed standards include targeting accuracy (≤1 mm for SRS, ≤2 mm for SBRT) and high doses per fraction (≥5 Gy).
- Multidisciplinary staffing, advanced imaging, precise immobilization, and rigorous quality assurance were consistently emphasized.
Conclusions:
- Substantial variability exists in SRT definitions and implementation despite its widespread adoption.
- There is a critical need for unified, updated guidelines for SRT.
- Standardized clinical practices and incorporation of technological advancements are essential for consistent, high-quality patient outcomes.

