Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Hijacked medical journals rank first via search engine optimization and threaten academic integrity
Mihály Hegedűs1, Mehdi Dadkhah2, Lóránt Dénes Dávid3
1Department of Finance and Accounting, Tomori Pál College, Budapest, Hungary; Chamber of Hungarian Auditors, Budapest, Hungary.
Abstract:
The rise of questionable journals poses a significant threat to academic integrity, resulting in substantial waste of institutional and university resources. This commentary analysis focuses on six hijacked medical journals, a specific type of questionable publication. We utilized Semrush, an online Search Engine Optimization auditing platform, to analyse our data, which revealed that hijacked journals disseminate their content through search engines. Specifically, searches for certain medical keywords return hijacked medical journals' content among the top 20 results. Evidence from both previous research and the current study suggests that hijacked journals leverage various channels for content dissemination, including artificial intelligence chatbots, citation databases, spam emails, and search engines. Raising awareness about this issue is crucial to mitigating the immediate harm caused by these journals. Furthermore, long-term solutions will necessitate advancements in technological development to combat this evolving problem effectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Antibiotic Selection
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Ethics and Bioethics
Cancer
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

