[Clinical study on the effect of glycosaminoglycans on vascular endothelial glycocalyx in sepsis]

To explore the protective effect of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) on vascular endothelium in patients with sepsis.

A prospective study was conducted on adult patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Hangzhou Normal University Affiliated Hospital from December 2022 to December 2023. Patients were randomly divided into conventional treatment group and GAG intervention group. Both groups were treated according to the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. The GAG intervention group was additionally treated with GAG (2 mL of sulodexide intramuscular injection once daily for 7 days) on the basis of conventional treatment. Venous blood was collected from patients at 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days after enrollment to detect serum vascular endothelial glycocalyx [heparan sulfate (HS) and syndecan-1 (SDC-1)], inflammatory markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], and coagulation markers [prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), antithrombin-III (AT-III), fibrinogen (Fib), D-Dimer], and to perform acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scores. The prognosis of patients (length of hospital stay, ICU and 28-day mortality) was observed. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to evaluate the value of HS in predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients, and the correlation between endothelial glycocalyx degradation products and various clinical indicators was analyzed.

A total of 50 adult patients with sepsis meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, with 25 in the conventional treatment group and 25 in the GAG intervention group. In terms of degradation products of endothelial glycocalyx, compared to baseline, both groups showed an increasing trend in HS and SDC-1 levels post-treatment. However, the GAG intervention group exhibited significantly lower HS levels at 72 hours and 7 days, as well as lower SDC-1 levels at 6, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days compared to the conventional group. Among the surviving patients, the HS levels at 72 hours and SDC-1 levels at 6 hours of treatment in the GAG intervention group were significantly reduced compared to the conventional treatment group. In terms of severity score, compared with before treatment, the GAG intervention group showed a significant decrease in APACHE II, SOFA, and ISTH scores after 7 days of treatment. The SOFA scores of the GAG intervention group after 48 hours and 7 days of treatment were significantly lower than those of the conventional treatment group. In terms of inflammatory indicators, compared with before treatment, the GAG intervention group showed a significant decrease in IL-6 levels after 48 hours of treatment. With the prolongation of treatment time, the CRP levels of both groups of patients showed a significant downward trend, and at 7 days of treatment, the CRP level in the GAG intervention group was significantly lower than that in the conventional treatment group. In terms of coagulation function, with prolonged treatment time, PT and APTT of both groups of patients showed an increasing trend, while Fib showed a decreasing trend. The GAG intervention group showed a significant prolongation of PT after 72 hours of treatment compared to the conventional treatment group. In terms of prognosis, there were no statistically significant differences in ICU and 28-day mortality rates between the two groups. The GAG intervention group had significantly shorter hospital stays than the conventional treatment group. ROC curve analysis showed that HS, CRP, APTT, IL-6, APACHE II, SOFA, and ISTH scores were predictive factors for the prognosis of sepsis patients (all P < 0.05). Compared to a single indicator, the combined detection of multiple indicators has a higher value in predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.911, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.817-1.000], with a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 91.9%. Correlation analysis showed that HS was significantly negatively correlated with Fib, PT, TNF-α, IL-6, and PCT (r values were -0.338, -0.396, -0.288, -0.319, and -0.340, all P < 0.05), while HS was significantly positively correlated with D-Dimer and CRP (r values were 0.347 and 0.354, both P < 0.05); SDC-1 was significantly negatively correlated with Fib, PT, APTT, TNF-α, IL-6, and ISTH scores (r values were -0.314, -0.294, -0.408, -0.353, -0.289, -0.287, all P < 0.05).

Early glycocalyx degradation can occur in sepsis patients. GAG have a protective effect on,the vascular endothelium, reducing the severity of sepsis and providing organ protection. HS, CRP, APTT, IL-6, APACHE II score, SOFA score, and ISTH score are independent predictive factors for the prognosis of sepsis patients. The combination of HS and the above indicators can significantly improve the accuracy of prediction.